Subjectivity in the Twentieth Century
J. Rée
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/NLH.1995.0015
1995-02-01
Abstract:twentieth-century discussions of subjectivity, and in particular breaking with Descartes?breaking not so much with the details of his writings, as with the whole tendency of his thought And, if the histories of philosophy are to be believed, Descartes's determination to take nothing on trust marked an epoch. It was as if he did not know his own strength, as he brought the entire fabric of medieval certainties crashing down around him, and had to dash for cover within his own private subjectivity, with only one fragment of his former self-confidence left to cling to, namely his certainty of his own existence as a mind, a thinker of thoughts. This small Cartesian relic is what the eighteenth century histories of philosophy called, in a curious piece of macaronic doggerel, "the cogito" (le cogito, das Cogito): that is to say, "the I think" Then, from out of his desolate "cogito," Descartes, spider-like, spun out a world?the modern world, in fact, that is to say, the material world, the materialist world, the world of the Enlightenment; perhaps the western and imperialist and protestant and capitalist ethnocentric and phallocentric technological world as well?a world not of meaning and love and laughter and tears, but of abstract thinking; not of flesh and tastes and smells and sounds and sights, but of material particles going about their lonely business surrounded by the frightening silence of infinite space, in indifferent conformity to universal causal laws. Some of these particles, according to the script assigned to the Cartesians, would in due course come together to form animals, and some of these would take the shape of human beings. And for one particular case?its own?each human being will know for sure that it is more than just a physical machine. It will know that it also has, or rather is, a "cogito," enthroned in the nerve center at the middle of its head. And it will assume that other "cogitos," just like its own, are in residence somewhere behind other people's eyes. But this will of course only be a conjecture, since it has only external evidence to go on. For all it knows, other people could just be machines rigged up to give the impression that there is a thinker cogitating away somewhere inside.
Philosophy