Body Aesthetics SHERRI IRVIN (Ed.) Oxford University Press, 2016; 330 pp; $74.00 (hardback)

Vanessa Cimon-Lambert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217318000185
2018-04-15
Dialogue
Abstract:of a choice: “to care for or neglect the Earth” (134). There is no reason to believe we will choose correctly, or that our choice-moment fits into any kind of neat, progressivist historical narrative. If anything, Hamilton has been persistently pessimistic on this score (he is after all the author of a previous book on climate change called, Requiem for a Species). But he is surely right about the existence of the choice. This book’s tone is often bombastic, its arguments overly simple and lacking in philosophical nuance. Indeed, in places it reads more like a manifesto than a serious and measured reflection on the relevant issues. But in spite of this it is both timely and important. In short, Hamilton is absolutely correct to claim that if we are going to both understand and survive the mess that is the Anthropocene, we require (a) a re-invigorated philosophy of history; and (b) a species-level, though not biologically reductive, conception of who and what we most fundamentally are. Philosophy’s most urgent task, I believe, is to figure out how these two elements fit together.
Art,Philosophy,Environmental Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?