Abstract:<h3 class="block__title">Policy Points</h3><ul class="unordered-list"><li>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has in recent years allowed onto the market several drugs with limited evidence of safety and effectiveness, provided that manufacturers agree to carry out additional studies while the drugs are in clinical use.</li><li>Studies suggest that these postmarketing requirements (PMRs) frequently lack transparency, are subject to delays, and fail to answer the questions of greatest clinical importance. Yet, none of the literature speaks directly to the challenges that the FDA—as a regulatory institution—encounters in enforcing PMRs.</li><li>Through a series of interviews with FDA leadership, this article analyzes and situates those challenges in the midst of political threats to the FDA's public health mandate.</li></ul><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Context</h3><p>Modern pharmaceutical regulation is premised on a rigorous examination of a drug's safety and effectiveness prior to its lawful sale. However, since the 1990s, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has gradually shifted to a model of "lifecycle" regulation that increasingly relies on postmarketing requirements (PMRs) to encourage studies of drug safety and effectiveness following regulatory approval. This article examines the range of legal, institutional, and political challenges that FDA faces in the context of lifecycle regulation.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Document‐based legal and policy analysis was combined with a set of semistructured interviews of current and former FDA officials (<i>n</i> = 23) in order to explore the implications of the FDA's use of PMRs. The median interview time per official was 61 minutes, with a range of 24 to 227 minutes. All of the officials interviewed occupied positions of leadership and influence within the FDA, such as directors of an FDA center or office, key legal counsel on agency‐wide policy initiatives, and the commissioner of the FDA. </p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Findings</h3><p>Insufficient resources and coordination within the FDA, inadequate legal authorities, and the political economy of withdrawing an approved indication in the face of opposition from companies and patients all contribute to the observed shortcomings in the FDA's use and enforcement of PMRs. Further, the FDA is fully aware of these challenges, yet is seemingly resigned to and resistant to criticism of its use of PMRs.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>This study of the FDA's shift toward lifecycle regulation reveals not simply an agency in transition, but rather an agency on guard against a set of larger political threats to its mandate. This can be characterized as a state of institutional incumbency in which the agency is engaged in an effort to reproduce key features of the regulatory system—in concert with regulated industries and others—while simultaneously sanctioning significant changes to the regulatory standards the FDA has long applied, to the detriment of public health.</p>

Amidst spreading infectious diseases and climate change, US FDA should renew its focus on neglected tropical diseases

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory response to combat neglected tropical diseases (NTDs): A review

We are what we eat: Regulatory gaps in the United States that put our health at risk

Regulation of Added Substances in the Food Supply by the Food and Drug Administration Human Foods Program

Newest Updates to Health Providers on the Hazards of Ultra-Processed Foods and Proposed Solutions

Emerging Infectious Diseases: Public Health Issues for the 21st Century

Pharmaceutical Drugs of Uncertain Value, Lifecycle Regulation at the US Food and Drug Administration, and Institutional Incumbency

New Agents Are Coming, and so Is the Resistance

Addressing the Challenge of Common Chronic Diseases — A View from the FDA

How Global Collaboration Can Improve the Medical Countermeasure Life Cycle for Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A BARDA Perspective

Ultraprocessed Food: Addictive, Toxic, and Ready for Regulation

Emerging foodborne pathogens

Neglected Tropical Diseases Attracts Global Attention

Rejuvenating American Healthcare

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Mainstream recognition of health effects and implications for the practicing internist

Trends in Burdens of Disease by Transmission Source (USA, 2005–2020) and Hazard Identification for Foods: Focus on Milkborne Disease

The Prevention of Global Chronic Disease: Academic Public Health's New Frontier

[Current Major Public Health Challenges].

FDA perspective on antivirals against biothreats: communicate early and often

Disease Prevention and Health Promotion in Urban Areas: CDC's Perspective

Action on antimicrobial resistance must include the public