Writing in international journals is getting easier

Henk Stam,Kristian Borg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.39905

2024-01-22

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract:Abstract missing (Editorial)

rehabilitation,sport sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Is Editing the Roadblock to the Internationalization of Chinese Academic Journals?

Jianping Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b1110120

2011-01-01

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B

Abstract:"China's internationalization" is in part realized through the dissemination of Chinese publications, such as academic journals. Therefore, editorial proficiency in the English language is of vital importance to the quality of the journals. This article analyzes the results of the two projects sponsored by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China in 2007 and 2010 respectively, namely the "Analytical Evaluation of Language and Editing Quality of Chinese Academic Journals in English Language Issued in 2006", and the "Evaluation of Publication Quality of the China-Grown English Periodicals Issued in 2009, Sanctioned from 2005 to 2009", and proposes solutions to the problems presented therein.
Understanding Writing Styles of Scientific Papers in the IS-LS Domain: Evidence from Abstracts over the Past Three Decades

Ningyuan Song,Kejun Chen,Yuehua Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101377

IF: 3.7

2023-01-01

Journal of Informetrics

Abstract:To some extent, written academic discourse represents the knowledge and practices of the aca-demic community. Studies investigating writing styles in various disciplines have flourished, but fewer studies have leveraged multi-perspective linguistic indices to analyze academic writings, especially in the information science and library science (IS-LS) domain. This study attempts to provide an overview of how writing styles have evolved over the past 30 years across various subfields in IS-LS from multiple perspectives, that is, lexical complexity, cohesion, syntactic com-plexity, and readability. Based on a large set of abstracts of academic papers published in IS-LS, the empirical findings showed that the readability, cohesion, and lexical sophistication of ab-stracts in the IS-LS domain have increased over time, indicating that abstracts tend to contain more information but become less accessible. The gradual improvement in cohesion suggests that academic writing logic has increased, and the rigor of knowledge construction of scientific papers has improved. Furthermore, considerable linguistic variations emerged between subfields in the IS-LS domain, particularly at the lexical level. This study suggested that different subfields had various writing styles due to their research topics, methodologies, orientations, etc. The study also found that papers published in top quartile journals and those that gained higher citations typ-ically had larger lexical density, lexical sophistication, cohesion, and readability. This suggests that influential papers tend to carry more information, address more complex scientific issues, and exercise caution in knowledge construction and presentation.
Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 4/2021

Carmen Leitner,Marion Schulz,Marco Cavaco,David Andreu,Miguel A. R. B. Castanho,Ben Hicks,Petra Vasko,J. R. Goicoechea,Simon Aldridge,Anne Lipp,Shorouk O. Badir,Gary A. Molander,Rafael Marín,Gabriel Brunet,Muralee Murugesu,Nathaniel Corrigan,Mustafa Çiftçi,Kwangjin Jung,Célia Boyer,Luis M. Rodríguez,Paula Gómez,M Mμs-Montoya,J.-A. Abad,A Tμrraga,J Cerdμ,J Øndez,David Curiel,Nobuyuki Nishi,Kenta Seki,Daisuke Takahashi,Kazunobu Toshima,Kuanxiao Tang,Minakshi Raj,Shuyuan Xu,M Liu,Yuyang Bai,Hui Liu,Paul ’t Hart,Pascal Hommen,Anaïs F. M. Noisier,Arkadiusz Krzyżanowski,D. Schüler,Arthur T. Porfetye,Mohammad Akbarzadeh,Ingrid R. Vetter,H Dihou,Herbert Waldmann,Koel Dutta,Pintu Kanjilal,Ritam Das,S. Thayumanavan,Young‐Han Shin,H Cho,B. H. Choi,Jaehwan Kim,Han Liang,Lirong Wang,Y. -X Ji,Huan Wang,Bing Zhang,Hao Ge,G Li,Lei Han,Biao Ding,Pu Duan,Reinhard Schulz,A Rçmer,B Vankuiken,S Dechert,S Demeshko,George E. Cutsail,Serena DeBeer,Ricardo A. Mata,Franc Meyer,Arnab K. Maity,Alina M. Alb,Mat thias Zeller,Christopher Uyeda,Conor Lanphere,Patrick M. Arnott,Stephen Jones,Katarina Korlova,Stefan Howorka,Zili Lyu,Shanfeng Zhu,Min Xie,Y Zhang,Zhe Chen,Rong Chen,Mingliang Tian,Mingmin Chi,M. Shao,Yu Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202180411

2021-01-01

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract:Angewandte Chemie International EditionVolume 60, Issue 4 p. 1665-1682 Graphical AbstractFree Access Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 4/2021 First published: 18 January 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202180411Citations: 2AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume60, Issue4January 25, 2021Pages 1665-1682 RelatedInformation
Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 7/2024

Hanyang Lin,Zhehao Huang,Haoquan Zheng,Anna Hartmann,P. Paetzold,Hermann Ätzig (braunschweig,Marie Arrowsmith,Narendra Kotwal,Prem M. S. Chauhan,Joel W. Reed,Florian P. Seebeck,Kai Mundsinger,Aidan E. Izuagbe,Bryan T. Tuten,Peter W. Roesky,C Barner-Kowollik,C Torres-Møndez,M. Axelsson,He Tian,Jie Yang,C. J. Tang,Yurui Xu,Yanjie Guo,Wei Li,Yiqun Chen,Hao Jia,Jian Zhang,Mengliu Yang,Rong Cao,Yanqin Li,Jang-Cheon Cho,Shuai Jiao,Alan Bagnall,Sabyasachi Ganguli,Alina Sekretareva,Y Wang,Tingting Yang,Xuezhong Fan,Zhenshan Bao,Akhil Tayal,Ting Hu,Minjun Shi,Zhiqing Liang,Mengnan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202480711

2024-01-01

Angewandte Chemie

Abstract:Angewandte Chemie International EditionVolume 63, Issue 7 e202480711 Graphical AbstractFree Access Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 7/2024 First published: 05 February 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202480711AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume63, Issue7February 12, 2024e202480711 RelatedInformation
Writing a better research article

Thomas A. Lang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe.2017.11.06

2017-12-18

Journal of Public Health and Emergency

Abstract:Publication is the last stage of research. Writing the research article is also probably the shortest, least-expensive, and arguably the most important part of the process because the published article is usually the only lasting record of your research. In addition, readers often assume that the quality of the writing indicates the quality of the research. Clear, concise writing implies clear, concise thinking, which is necessary for good research. However, few authors are taught how to write an article; how to properly document their research and statistical analyses; how to prepare tables, graphs, and images for publication; what ethical issues need to be addressed; how to choose a journal; and how to communicate with the journal throughout the publishing process. In this article, I describe several ways to write a better research article. In addition to how to improve each section of the article—the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references—I offer advice for improving the writing itself. Using the techniques presented, you should be able to shorten your article substantially, without eliminating needed information, while improving clarity. Nothing guarantees acceptance by a journal, but a well-written article is easier to accept than a poorly written one. Once published, your article will be in the literature—forever—with your name on it. Given that the quality of your publications affects your professional reputation, making sure your publications are the best they can be is one of the greatest investments you can make in your career.
The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality

J. Flowerdew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041

2019-04-01

Language Teaching

Abstract:Academics are coming under increasing pressure to publish internationally. Given the global dominance of English, this very likely means publishing in English-medium journals and with publishers which publish in English. This raises the important question of the possible disadvantage of those scholars whose first language is not English and who therefore have the additional burden of having to develop adequate proficiency in an additional language, English. As a student of modern languages to university level and of other languages to rather lower levels of proficiency and as a teacher of English for academic purposes (EAP) and of English for research and publication purposes (ERPP), since I became aware of this issue, I have always believed this extra burden on the English as an additional language (EAL) academic writer to be a self-evident truth. Ken Hyland, however, in a recent book (Hyland, 2015) and an article titled ‘Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice’ (Hyland, 2016a), has taken it upon himself to argue that such an assumption is ill-founded. Hyland argues that native-speakers (NSs) of English encounter the same difficulties as non-native speakers (NNSs) when it comes to academic writing, that ‘academic English is no one's first language’, and that it requires ‘deliberate learning’ by both NSs and NSs (p. 57). Native and non-native writers, Hyland implies, are on a level playing field when it comes to writing for publication, both groups having to jump the same hurdles.

Linguistics,Sociology
Writing good abstracts

Andrei V Alexandrov,Michael G Hennerici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000098324

Abstract:Introduction: Writing an abstract means to extract and summarize (AB - absolutely, STR - straightforward, ACT - actual data presentation and interpretation). Thousands of abstracts are submitted to stroke conferences each year. The following suggestions may improve the chances of your work being selected for presentation, and to communicate results in the most efficient and unambiguous way. TITLE AND STRUCTURE: Make the title dynamic and informative, rather than descriptive. Structure the abstract following the IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion) principle for your future original paper where background would become Introduction and conclusions would enter Discussion. Select the appropriate category for submission carefully. This determines which experts grade the abstract and the session where your competitors represent their work. If selected appropriately, your abstract is more likely to be graded by peers with similar interests and familiarity with your work or field. Methods should describe the study design and tools of data acquisition shortly, not data. Results: Provide data that answer the research question. Describe most important data with numbers and statistics. Make your point with data, not speculations and opinions. Abbreviations should be avoided and only be used after they have been spelled out or defined. Common mistakes include failure to state the hypothesis, rationale for the study, sample size and conclusions. Highlight the novelty of your work by carefully chosen straightforward wording. Conclusions: Conclusions have to be based on the present study findings. Make sure your abstract is clear, concise and follows all rules. Show your draft to colleagues for critique, and if you are not a native English speaker show it to a person who can improve/correct your text. Remember that accepted abstracts of completed original research should be followed by published original papers - if this is not intended or fails, it may indicate an impaired ability to succeed in scientific writing and an academic career.
More flexibility and author friendly steps toward publication

Ji-Dong Gu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2024.105766

IF: 4.907

2024-03-06

International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation

Abstract:Scientific publications, specifically journal papers, are facing increasing challenges in a number of ways for both authors and publishers, and one of them is the friendliness of the format requirements by different journals even under the same editorial management system of the same publisher. At our most recent editors' meeting of this journal, decision were made and agreed upon for the following three items: 1) requirements on the physical form and style of manuscript will be relaxed immediately on the presentation of Results and Discussion, so that either combined or separation of them into 2 different sections are accepted for further processing; 2) citations of references in text will not be mandatorily to any specific one, so citations using Harvard or Chicago styles will be both acceptable from now on; and 3) a new category of publication will be started for a testing on experimental stage as Fast-track results. With all these new changes, it is hoped that publication will be less time consuming for authors so that precious time can be used in research than formatting or re-formatting the style for a submission.

environmental sciences,biotechnology & applied microbiology
[Writing English abstracts of high quality in standard English acceptable for publication]

Jia-wei Zheng,Zhi-yuan Zhang

Abstract:Writing an abstract presents a unique challenge to any author. It requires brevity of the written word, conciseness of thought and accuracy of presentation. A structured abstract is the most important starting point for a well written dental article. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, a Chinese national journal of oral medicine, oral and maxillofacial surgery, prosthodontics, orthodontics, oral pathology, endodontics, oral radiology, etc, has been included and indexed in Chemical Abstracts, Index Medicus and MEDLINE. This peer reviewed refereed journal demands Chinese and English abstracts of high quality for all manuscripts. Each manuscript should provide qualified abstracts for citation and indexing, which are written in standard English using the correct terms, sentences and grammar. Structured abstracts about 500 characters are required for clinical articles, clinical reports, basic scientific articles; while indicative abstracts (summary) are mandatory to short communications and case reports as well as review articles. Generally, the abstracts should be written in the past tense and passive voice (in the third person), with exception of conclusion(s), which can be in the primary tense and active voice. The structured abstracts are consisted of PURPOSE (S), METHODS, CONCLUSION (S), and CONCLUSION (S), which should offer the important information on the number of the subjects, methods of grouping and statistics, database attained, P values, etc. The conclusion (s) must be detailed rather than conceptive. This editorial introduces the ins and outs of writing an English abstracts acceptable for publication.
Language Barriers in Organismal Biology: What Can Journals Do Better?

B Nolde-Lopez,J Bundus,H Arenas-Castro,D Román,S Chowdhury,T Amano,V Berdejo-Espinola,S M Wadgymar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obad003

2023-01-01

Integrative Organismal Biology

Abstract:Synopsis In the field of organismal biology, as in much of academia, there is a strong incentive to publish in internationally recognized, highly regarded, English-language journals to promote career advancement. This expectation has created a linguistic hegemony in scientific publishing, whereby scholars for whom English is an additional language face additional barriers to achieving the same scientific recognition as scholars who speak English as a first language. Here, we surveyed the author guidelines of 230 journals in organismal biology with impact factors of 1.5 or greater for linguistically inclusive and equitable practices and policies. We looked for efforts that reflect first steps toward reducing barriers to publication for authors globally, including the presence of statements that encouraged submissions from authors of diverse nationalities and backgrounds, policies regarding manuscript rejection based on perceived inadequacies of the English language, the existence of bias-conscious reviewer practices, whether translation and editing resources or services are available, allowance for non-English abstracts, summaries, or translations, and whether journals offer license options that would permit authors (or other scholars) to translate their work and publish it elsewhere. We also directly contacted a subset of journals to verify whether the information on their author guidelines page accurately reflects their policies and the accommodations they would make. We reveal that journals and publishers have made little progress toward beginning to recognize or reduce language barriers. Counter to our predictions, journals associated with scientific societies did not appear to have more inclusive policies compared to non-society journals. Many policies lacked transparency and clarity, which can generate uncertainty, result in avoidable manuscript rejections, and necessitate additional time and effort from both prospective authors and journal editors. We highlight examples of equitable policies and summarize actions that journals can take to begin to alleviate barriers to scientific publishing.
New Chapter Ahead

Tao Xie

2019-01-01

Abstract:Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary. com). DOI: 10.1002/stvr. 1724 experience or infrastructure. Underlying these two kinds of papers is often impact-producing research or infrastructure that should be incentivized, encouraged, and embraced. We hope that adding these new paper categories will help researchers to better pursue impactful research. We plan to write some future editorials to elaborate the details of these new paper categories and provide guidelines on writing high-quality papers falling into these paper categories. In addition, we have added a few new social media channels for the journal as new outlets for communicating journal-related information to the broad audience. For example, the journal has a Twitter handle: StvrJ, that is, https://twitter. com/StvrJ (please follow it, and it will follow you back!), a Facebook page: https://www. facebook. com/stvrj/(please like it!), and a …
Contributing to global literature on theory, practice, and methods

Eleanor Krassen Covan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2024.2317092

2024-03-10

Health Care For Women International

Abstract:Readers are encouraged to read the brief research report written by Maarijke Schotanus-Dijkstra. It is published here to explain that even when editors provide double-blind peer review, we make mistakes which require us to retract articles that have been published previously. Dr. Schotanus-Dijstra's work contributes methodologically because she explains in detail how she uncovered research that was not original.

public, environmental & occupational health,womens studies
Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 8/2024

Anna Hartmann,Patricia Gorgojo,Sidney Cobb,S Rodríguez-Jimønez,Erwin Reisner,Swati Chandna,C Olivares,Egor Baranovskii,George Engelmann,A Bçker,Carl Christoph Tzschucke,Rainer Haag,Yuge Guan,Shoichi Nishitani,Tu Tran,Andrew Puglise,Shiping Yang,Michael R. Landry,Zoe L. P. Arnott,Hywel Morgan,Kieren G. Hollingsworth,Christine Stevenson,D. Louis Collins,Alexandra Tamasanu,David Machin,Josephine A. Dolan,T Kamin ́ski,Gemma C. Wildsmith,David Williamson,Isabelle B. Pickles,Stuart L. Warriner,William Turnbull,Michael E. Webb,Gabriele Laudadio,Philipp Neigenfind,C Pøter,M. Rubel,T Oderinde,Helen Ewing,J Palkowitz,K Sloane,Daniel W. Gillman,Peter Mandler,Michele Bolduc,B Nicastri,Shuang‐Nan Zhang,N Clementson,Peter Petersen,Pablo Martín‐Gago,K Mykhailiuk,P. Baran,Hao Wu,S Chen,Chunjie Liu,Lei Zhao,Z Wang,Qi Jin,Shanshan Sun,Jinxin Guo,Xiangming He,Pamela Walsh,You Shang,Johannes Morstein,Alexander Amatuni,A. R. SHUSTER,Wolfgang Kuttenlochner,Ko T,Daniel Abegg,M. Groll,Alexander Adibekian,Hans Renata,Doris A. Trauner,Alejandra Matamoros‐Recio,E Alonso-Rueda,Eli J. Borrego,A. Caballero,P Pørez,Sonsoles Martín‐Santamaría

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202480811

2024-01-01

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract:Angewandte Chemie International EditionVolume 63, Issue 8 e202480811 Graphical AbstractFree Access Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 8/2024 First published: 12 February 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202480811AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume63, Issue8February 19, 2024e202480811 RelatedInformation
Writing with “Academic Style”: Theoretical considerations and preliminary findings on the new frontiers of EAP

ROXANNE BARBARA DOERR

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905x.1.10.2.2757

2023-12-21

Abstract:Research in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) has increased in terms of teaching and learning forms, methods and materials over the past decades. The globalisation of knowledge sharing and communication within the academic community, and the inclusion of marginalised higher education and research institutions have resulted in an ongoing evolution of many EAP-related terms. Nevertheless, underexplored areas of EAP research and practice remain, including that of “academic style”, a necessary integration of EAP and academic writing teaching and practice. The study presents a pilot study consisting in the detailed qualitative analysis of a collection of abstracts from a PhD seminar on academic style (self)proofreading. By employing a methodological framework combining stylistics, error analysis, and the categorisation of specific “areas of interest”, the pilot study highlights relevant stylistic errors in academic writing and draws conclusions on the requirements and implications of introducing academic style to EAP.
Writing the rules in AI-assisted writing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00678-6

IF: 23.8

2023-05-24

Nature Machine Intelligence

Abstract:As many authors are experimenting with using large language models in writing articles, some guidelines are becoming clear, but these will need to evolve as the capabilities and integration of such tools develop further.

computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
Writing for Publication as a Native Speaker: The Experiences of Two Anglophone Novice Scholars

Ismaeil Fazel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_5

2018-07-31

Abstract:Extant empirical literature on writing for scholarly publication has tended to predominantly focus on impediments facing English as an Additional Language (EAL) doctoral students (e.g., Ho in Journal of English for Academic Purposes 27: 1–13, 2017; Li in TESOL Quarterly 41: 55–79, 2007) in getting published. Little empirical research, except for Habibie (Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Brill Publishing, Leiden, Netherlands, pp. 51–67, 2016), has attended to issues encountered by Anglophone doctoral students in academic publication. In this chapter, drawing from the writing-for-publication experiences of two Anglophone doctoral students at a Canadian research-intensive university, I will present the discursive and nondiscursive issues and challenges potentially facing novice Anglophone scholars in the process of writing for scholarly publication.
English Writing for International Publication in the Age of Globalization: Practices and Perceptions of Mainland Chinese Academics in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Meng Ge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020043

2015-03-25

Publications

Abstract:Much scholarly attention has been given to the English writing and publishing practices of the academics in non-Anglophone countries, but studies on such practices in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) have in general been limited. The case of Mainland Chinese HSS academics is potentially interesting. On the one hand, international publications in these disciplines have been on the increase, which are also encouraged by the national research policy of “going-out”. On the other hand, unlike those in science and technology (S&T), such practices in the HSS are still much less institutionalized at the local level. In the study reported in this article, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine academics in economics, sociology and archaeology from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), and all nine participants had prior experience in international publishing. With a focus on participants’ experiences and perceptions, findings from this study demonstrated the relatively passive role participants played in their international publications, the importance of various resources in bringing forth these publications, and the relations between participants’ alignments with the local or international community and their voluntary investment in participating in their practices. Implications of the study were also discussed.
Analysis of Abstracts in Scientific Papers Written in English Using Corpora

Rodrigo Tovar Viera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v4i2.323

2019-10-20

Abstract:Research article abstracts are the gateways to communicate the research findings. This function and the significant contribution in disseminating the knowledge production have been the issue of academic research studies across disciplines. Abstracts, indeed, after titles, are the most read section freely available online. However, despite the impressive output contribution to the academic discourse community, both national and international and much research developed on abstracts, investigations particularly contrasting article abstracts published in Ecuadorian and North-American journals are scarce. The study examines the rhetorical organization and the linguistic realizations of abstract written in four disciplines, by first identifying the move structure and then their linguistic realizations, including verb tense, clauses, modals and stance markers. The contrastive analysis of English and Spanish texts is based on a corpus of 120 abstracts from the fields of humanities and science. Results showed that abstract published in Ecuadorian and North-American journals from four disciplines do put more emphasis on purpose, method, and product (results) in order to introduce the new knowledge. Throughout the corpus present, past tense, and hedges were the most frequent categories. The present tense commonly occurred in M1-M2-M5. The similarities and differences in the rhetorical organization and linguistic realizations of abstract moves might be attributed to the context of publication; however, such rhetorical and style choices remain quite unclear, in terms of conventional patterns or authors’ preferences.
Scholarly mathematical communication at a crossroads

Greg Kuperberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0210144

2002-10-10

Abstract:This essay was invited for publication in Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde; it will also appear in translation in the SMF Gazette and in the DMV Mitteilungen. I discuss the recent trends in scholarly communication in mathematics, the current state and intentions of the arXiv, and a proposal to reform peer review with the arXiv as a foundation.

History and Overview

Writing in international journals is getting easier

Is Editing the Roadblock to the Internationalization of Chinese Academic Journals?

Understanding Writing Styles of Scientific Papers in the IS-LS Domain: Evidence from Abstracts over the Past Three Decades

Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 4/2021

Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 7/2024

Writing a better research article

The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality

Writing good abstracts

More flexibility and author friendly steps toward publication

[Writing English abstracts of high quality in standard English acceptable for publication]

Language Barriers in Organismal Biology: What Can Journals Do Better?

New Chapter Ahead

Contributing to global literature on theory, practice, and methods

Graphical Abstract: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 8/2024

Writing with “Academic Style”: Theoretical considerations and preliminary findings on the new frontiers of EAP

Writing the rules in AI-assisted writing

Writing for Publication as a Native Speaker: The Experiences of Two Anglophone Novice Scholars

English Writing for International Publication in the Age of Globalization: Practices and Perceptions of Mainland Chinese Academics in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Analysis of Abstracts in Scientific Papers Written in English Using Corpora

Scholarly mathematical communication at a crossroads