Abstract:This paper employs the concept of epistemic justice to examine the potential for gender equality plans (GEPs) to bring about sustainable transformative change towards gender equality in higher education. Mindful of both the limitations and opportunities of gender policy interventions, the paper highlights the importance of approaching gender inequalityasaproblemofjusticeandpowerratherthanasan issueof“lossoftalent.”Thepaper drawsonFricker'saccount of epistemic justice as well as on Bourdieu's analysis of power in the academic field, to evaluate seven GEPs in European universities for their potential to transform gender–power relations in academia. The analysis reveals that insufficient attention is paid to the role of academic power in creating gender injustice at all institutional levels and to the role of organizational culture in the perpetuation of gender inequalities in those settings. The study suggests that the incorporation of an epistemic justice lens in the creation of GEPs would address gendered power relationships and lead to sustainable equitable outcomes. towards gender equality is the goal of GEPs developed in universities in and beyond. what the potential of GEPs to achieve institutional transformation? What pitfalls do they encounter? This explores these questions through the analysis of the GEPs of seven European universities. It utilizes a normative framework based on the concept of epistemic justice to examine the potential of GEPs to disrupt gender–power structures and dynamics to bring about sustainable, gender ‐ equal institutional change. reset a traditional culture that normalizes unequal gendered expectations and behaviors, and distribute epistemic ‐ supporting resources in a gender ‐ just manner. The paper utilizes this normative framework in an analysis of seven GEPs in European universities. Specifically, it surveyed provisions aimed at transforming organizational cultures through changes in both formal and informal rules governing the conferral of epistemic authority, while mindful of the conditions that need to be in place for sustainable institutional change to occur.

Gender Equality in Engineering: An Institutional Reflection

Athena SWAN gender equality plans and the gendered impact of COVID‐19

Taking Stock and Looking Forward: Fifteen Years of Research on Gender, Race, and Power in Engineering Studies

Inclusion of the gender equality sustainable development goal in engineering teaching and research

Breaking down barriers: The identification of actions to promote gender equality in interdisciplinary marine research institutions

Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol

Refining a DEI Assessment Tool for Use in Optimizing Professional STEM Societies for Gender Equity

Enduring inequalities: Fifty years of gender equality talk in the media and cultural industries

Naming the parts: a case-study of a gender equality initiative with academic women

Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges

Closing the scissor-shaped curve: Strategies to promote gender equality in academia

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Fixing the leaky pipeline: Tips to promote gender equity in Academic Medicine

Gender Equality in STEM: Exploring Self-Efficacy Through Gender Awareness

A critical exploration of approaches to professional and leadership development to break the gender bias in academic practice and progression

Overstaying our welcome: On the rise of women's seniority in the academy

The Equality Maturity Model: an actionable tool to advance gender balance in leadership and participation roles

Gender equality as a resource and a dilemma: interpretative repertoires in engineering education in Sweden

Working Towards an Inclusive Research Culture Through EDI Education, Engagement and Empowerment of the Research Community

Women Inengineering: Women Change the World

Perceived employability and career readiness among STEM students: does gender matter?