Is low‐dose glucagon needed and effective in preventing fasted exercise‐induced hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes treated with the MiniMed 780G, an automated insulin delivery system?

Sissel Banner Lundemose,Olivia M. McCarthy,Merete Bechmann Christensen,Christian Laugesen,Richard M. Bracken,Jens Juul Holst,Ajenthen Gayathri Ranjan,Kirsten Nørgaard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16103
2024-11-29
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Abstract:Aim To evaluate and compare the plasma glucose (PG) response during spontaneous fasted morning moderate‐intensity exercise with and without injection of subcutaneous glucagon in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with an automated insulin delivery (AID) system. Methods Ten adults (four female) with T1D (age 50 [42–67] years, diabetes duration: 22 [14–44] years, HbA1c: 55 [47–69] mmol/mol) treated with the MiniMedTM 780G AID system participated in a proof‐of‐concept two‐period, crossover trial. Fasting participants undertook a 45 min bout of continuous moderate‐intensity (~60% V̇O2peak) exercise on a cycle ergometer followed by 1 h of rest. Before exercise, 150‐μg glucagon was administered subcutaneously on visit 1 (GLUC) but not on visit 2 (NO‐GLUC). Temporary target on the AID was activated 15 min before until 15 min after exercise cessation. Blood samples were taken at 5‐ and 15‐min intervals for measuring PG and biomarkers. Data were analysed using paired t tests or repeated measures ANOVA. Results Time in range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) was 100% on both study visits. No hypoglycaemia (<3.9 mmol/L) occurred in either arm. The GLUC arm had significantly higher mean PG (p = 0.01), area under the PG curve (p = 0.01), coefficient of variation (p
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?