Abstract:Summary Background Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can provide a comprehensive assessment of glycaemic control. This exploratory analysis of the ONWARDS 1 trial assessed CGM-based metrics and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia duration in insulin-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100). Methods ONWARDS 1 was a 78-week (52-week main treatment phase and a 26-week treatment extension phase plus a 5-week follow-up), randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial done at 143 sites (outpatient clinics and hospital departments) across 12 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA 1c : 7·0–11·0%) who had not previously received insulin were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web-response system to once-weekly icodec or once-daily glargine U100. Double-masked CGM data were collected during treatment initiation (weeks 0–4), midtrial (weeks 22–26), end of main phase (weeks 48–52), end of extension phase (weeks 74–78), and follow-up (weeks 78–83). Secondary and exploratory outcomes were CGM-based metrics, including the mean percentages of time in glycaemic range (TIR; sensor glucose 3·9–10·0 mmol/L [70–180 mg/dL]), time in tight range (TITR; 3·9–7·8 mmol/L [70–140 mg/dL]), time above range (TAR; >10·0 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]), and time below range (TBR; <3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL] and <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]), and CGM-derived hypoglycaemic episode durations (episodes defined by sensor glucose <3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL for ≥15 consecutive minutes]). Analyses were done in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). The ONWARDS 1 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04460885 , and is complete. Findings Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned in ONWARDS 1 between Nov 25, 2020, and Dec 1, 2022 (n=492 in each treatment group). During treatment initiation, we observed no statistically significant differences in the mean percentages of TIR, TITR, TAR, and TBR with icodec versus glargine U100. During the midtrial, end of main phase, and end of extension phase periods, the mean percentages of TIR and TITR were statistically significantly greater and the mean percentages of TAR statistically significantly lower with icodec versus glargine U100. The mean percentages of TIR met the internationally recommended CGM target (>70%) with icodec but not with glargine U100 during the three periods. TBR (<3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL] and <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) was low and below recommended targets (<4% and <1%, respectively) across all study periods in both treatment groups, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for the lower threshold (<3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]). During the follow-up period, mean percentages of TIR, TITR, TAR, and TBR did not statistically significantly differ with icodec versus glargine U100. The duration of overall hypoglycaemic episodes was similar between treatment groups throughout the trial (median duration ≤35 min). Interpretation These CGM data support the long-term efficacy and safety of icodec versus glargine U100 during treatment and indicated no increase in the duration of individual hypoglycaemic episodes with icodec versus glargine U100 in insulin-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes. Funding Novo Nordisk.

218-OR: The Effect of Insulin Degludec vs. Insulin Glargine U100 on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Recorded Glycemic Metrics in People with Type 1 Diabetes and Recurrent Nocturnal Severe Hypoglycemia

The Effect of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 on Glucose Metrics Recorded During Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes and Recurrent Nocturnal Severe Hypoglycemia

131-OR: ADA Presidents’ Select Abstract: Effect of Insulin Degludec vs. Insulin Glargine U100 on Occurrence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Assessed by Nocturnal Plasma Glucose Profiles in People with Type 1 Diabetes Prone to Nocturnal Severe Hypoglycemia

Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on nocturnal glycaemia assessed by plasma glucose profiles in people with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia

Comparison of treatment with insulin degludec and glargine U100 in patients with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia: The HypoDeg randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover trial

Continuous glucose monitoring-based metrics and the duration of hypoglycaemia events with once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of ONWARDS 1

129-LB: A Comparison of CGM Metrics in People with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Different Insulin Modalities

114-LB: An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Glycemic Variability by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL vs. Glargine 100 U/mL in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia

735-P: Effects of Insulin Degludec in Patients with Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Scoping Review

647-P: Improved Glycemic Control and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Utilization: A Comparison of Real-Time CGM and Intermittent Scanning CGM

960-P: Hemodialysis-Related Glycemic Patterns among People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 (T2D) Diabetes—Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

Effects of insulin degludec and insulin glargine on day-to-day fasting plasma glucose variability in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, crossover study

Continuous Glucose Monitoring–Based Metrics and Hypoglycemia Duration in Insulin-Experienced Individuals With Long-Standing Type 2 Diabetes Switched From a Daily Basal Insulin to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec: Post Hoc Analysis of ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4

REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec in a Flexible Dosing Regimen vs Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): A 26-Week Randomized, Treat-to-Target Trial With a 26-Week Extension

Relationship Between Sensor-Detected Hypoglycemia and Patient-Reported Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 and Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The Hypo-METRICS Study

947-P: Glycemic Control Utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs. Point-of-Care Testing in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Long-Term Care Facilities

Effects of Switching from Degludec to Glargine U300 in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study

217-OR: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of IDegLira vs. Basal Bolus in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes and Very High HbA1c (>9%–15%) : IDegLira HIGH Trial

Characteristics of Nocturnal Hypoglycaemic Events and Their Impact on Glycaemia