Abstract:Background: Implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocols remains low. Protocol compliance among anesthesiologists tends to be suboptimal owing to the high workload and the attention required for implementation. The assisted fluid management (AFM) system is a novel decision support tool designed to help clinicians apply GDFT protocols. This system predicts fluid responsiveness better than anesthesia practitioners do and achieves higher stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index values during surgery. We tested the hypothesis that an AFM-guided GDFT strategy would also be associated with better sublingual microvascular flow compared to a standard GDFT strategy. Methods: This bicenter, parallel, 2-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, patient and assessor-blinded, superiority study considered for inclusion all consecutive patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery who required an arterial catheter and uncalibrated SV monitoring. Patients having standard GDFT received manual titration of fluid challenges to optimize SV while patients having an AFM-guided GDFT strategy received fluid challenges based on recommendations from the AFM software. In all patients, fluid challenges were standardized and titrated per 250 mL and vasopressors were administered to maintain a mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. The primary outcome (average of each patient's intraoperative microvascular flow index (MFI) across 4 intraoperative time points) was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and the treatment effect was estimated with a median difference between groups with a 95% confidence interval estimated using the bootstrap percentile method (with 1000 replications). Secondary outcomes included SV, cardiac index, total amount of fluid, other microcirculatory variables, and postoperative lactate. Results: A total of 86 patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was significantly higher in patients with AFM (median [Q1-Q3]: 2.89 [2.84-2.94]) versus those having standard GDFT (2.59 [2.38-2.78] points, median difference 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.49; P < .001). Cardiac index and SVI were higher (3.2 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.7 l.min-1.m-2; P = .001 and 42 [35-47] vs 36 [32-43] mL.m-2; P = .018) and arterial lactate concentration was lower at the end of the surgery in patients having AFM-guided GDFT (2.1 [1.5-3.1] vs 2.9 [2.1-3.9] mmol.L-1; P = .026) than patients having standard GDFT strategy. Patients having AFM received a higher fluid volume but 3 times less norepinephrine than those receiving standard GDFT (P < .001). Conclusions: Use of an AFM-guided GDFT strategy resulted in higher sublingual microvascular flow during surgery compared to use of a standard GDFT strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.

Hydrogel-coated and active clearance chest drains in cardiac surgery: real-world results of a single-center study

Study on the Application of A New Type of Anhydrous Thoracic Negative Pressure Drainage Device in Patients after Thoracic Surgery

Chest Tube Clearance Strategies Versus Conventional Chest Tubes After Cardiac Surgery

Hybrid (Digital/Water Seal) Chest Drainage System – An Innovative Device for Patients with Anticipated Air Leaks

Clinical outcomes and staff satisfaction after adoption of digital chest drainage system for minimally invasive lung resections

Chest Drainage Therapy: What Comes out of Pandora's Box Can Affect Patient Outcomes

Digital Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Chest Drainage System after Pulmonary Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Multi-Groove Silicone Drains in Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery and Their Effect on C-reactive Protein: a Single-Center Experience.

[Randomised comparison of different exit strategies in hydrocele resection]

247 Novel Automated Active Irrigation With Drainage Leads to Significantly Faster Hematoma Clearance and Lower Catheter-related Infections Compared to Passive Drainage Alone for cSDHA Propensity Score-matched Comparative Study with Volumetric Analysis

The role of hemoadsorption in cardiac surgery – a systematic review

Assisted Fluid Management and Sublingual Microvascular Flow During High-Risk Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Safety and Effectiveness of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Patients Undergoing Burr Hole Evacuation for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

#3285 EXTRACORPOREAL BLOOD PURIFICATION DURING OPEN HEART SURGERY WITH PROLONGED CPB: CYTOSORB 300 VS JAFRON HA330

Use of Novel Automated Active Irrigation With Drainage Versus Passive Drainage Alone for Chronic Subdural Hematoma—A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study With Volumetric Analysis

Does Active Chest Tube Clearance After Cardiac Surgery Provide Any Clear Benefits?

Conventional versus minimally invasive extra-corporeal circulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial (COMICS)

Drainless, day‐case lateral neck dissection with ArtissTM fibrin sealant: A prospective cohort study

Retromuscular, periprosthetic drainage after hernioplasty with sublay mesh reinforcement in ventral hernias results in less retromuscular fluid collections but longer hospital stay and analgetic use with unclear effect on clinical outcome - a randomized controlled trial

Drain-free donor site in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator free flap: A single-surgeon experience

[Postoperative drainage of the pleural cavity with aspiration of the contents by high-tech mobile devices]