Performance of the Dexcom G7 CGM System in Pregnant Women with Diabetes

Sarit Polsky,Amy Valent,Elvira Isganaitis,Kristin Castorino,Grenye O'Malley,Stayce Beck,Peggy Gao,Lori MB Laffel,Florence M Brown,Carol Levy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0516
2024-02-06
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Abstract:We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in pregnancy. Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (n=59), type 2 (n=21), or gestational diabetes (n=25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-hour clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate). Of the 1,739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2,102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1,659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%. The G7system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?