Abstract:Since the foundation of ″rights capacity″ in the German civil code,this concept has been accepted by many nations in the world.However,there is a shortcoming neglected for a long time.In many scholars' works,rights capacity express not only qualification or status but the concrete scope of enjoying rights and taking on obligations,which has brought about many conflicts in theory and practice.Based on the origin of rights capacity and the viewpoints of the scholars,the paper introduces the double-layer theory of rights capacity that is classified into abstract rights capacity and concrete rights capacity.The former settles the problems of qualification that judicial person could be a civil main body from the angle of abstract civil legal relations;the latter settles the problems of the scope in which judicial person could take part in the civil intercourse from the angle of concrete civil legal relations.Furthermore,the former makes judicial person obtain the status of main body;the latter limits the scope in which judicial person could enjoy rights and take on obligations.Thus,the content contained in the system of traditional rights capacity is divided into two parts, establishing the rights capacity system characterized by layers.Based on the double-layer theory of rights capacity,the paper elaborates the relation between rights capacity and personality.In fact,the personality of judicial person is equivalent to abstract rights capacity,being independent of concrete rights capacity.Therefore,it is not proper to equate the personality with rights capacity.Regarding the application of the double-layer theory to corporation law,the paper addresses these three aspects:(1) The ultra vires act of corporation is just the enlargement of the concrete rights capacity,while the abstract rights capacity of corporation(namely,personality) is not negated at all;so the corporation should take on legal obligation for its ultra vires act.(2) The denial of corporate personality negates corporate personality(namely,abstract rights capacity) completely and the stockholders of the corporation shall directly be held responsible.Nevertheless,the corporation's concrete rights capacity is not necessarily affected,because the stockholders' irregularity act may not in the scope of intention.(3) None of the corporation's abstract rights capacity and concrete rights capacity is in forfeiture in liquidation.The former does not change at all and the latter is limited in the scope of liquidation. The two kinds of rights capacity die out only after the liquidation is over.So the corporation in liquidation could take part in the litigation and accomplish rights and debts in the name of its own.

Responsibility of Supplementary Liquidation Responsibility after the Transfer of Defective Capital Equity

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

The Construction of Judicial Person' Double-layer Theory of Rights Capacity and Its Meaning in Corporation Law

On Types of Defects of Copyright and Legal Liability in the Performance of Publishing Contract

On Dispute Resolution and Legislation Advice for Defective Capital Contribution of Company's Shareholders

Restatement on the Transfer of Defective Equity——From Contractual Perspective

On the Application of Creditor’s Subrogate Right in Company Law——Creditor’s Remedies in the Case of Shareholder’s Violation of Duty of Contribution

Successor’s Liability in U.S.Law

To Whom Should the Shareholder be Liable for Failing to Make Capital Contributions

Analysis of Liability for Defective Capital Contribution of Company Shareholders Based on Discrete Regression Algorithm

The Liability of Shareholder Who Doesn't Wind Up Company

A Study on the Perfection of the Corporation Liquidation Obligor

On the Enforcement Risk Distribution Rule

Parent-Subsidiary Responsibility in the Development of Multinational Enterprises

On The Criteria And Responsibility System Of Information Disclosure Of Listed Companies In Mainland China

Liability Quality, Subjective Important Document and Doctrine of Liability Fixation on the Third Party Liability of Company Directors

Liabilities of Financial Payment on Account: Analysis Based on Social Law Theory

Understanding and Application of Fair Responsibility in the Civil Code

A Brief Analysis on Stock Rights Transfer of Company of Limited Liability ——and on the Amendment of the 35th Article of Company Law

On Competence of Promoter Whose Capacity Is Deficient

On Special Liquidation