Longitudinal feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in non-demented ALS patients

Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,Federica Solca,Silvia Torre,Eleonora Colombo,Alessio Maranzano,Alberto De Lorenzo,Valerio Patisso,Mauro Treddenti,Beatrice Curti,Claudia Morelli,Alberto Doretti,Federico Verde,Roberta Ferrucci,Sergio Barbieri,Fabiana Ruggiero,Alberto Priori,Vincenzo Silani,Nicola Ticozzi,Barbara Poletti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000538828
IF: 2.4
2024-04-20
European Neurology
Abstract:Introduction. The present study aimed at testing the longitudinal feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an Italian cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Methods. N=39 non-demented ALS patients were followed-up at a 5-to-10-month interval (M=6.8; SD=1.4) with the MoCA and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Practice effects, test-retest reliability and predictive validity (against follow-up ECAS scores) were assessed. Reliable change indices (RCIs) were derived via a regression-based approach by accounting for retest interval and baseline confounders (i.e., demographics, disease duration and severity and progression rate). Results. At retest, 100% and 69.2% of patients completed the ECAS and the MoCA, respectively. Patients who could not complete the MoCA showed a slightly more severe and fast-progressing disease. The MoCA was not subject to practice effects (t(32)=-.80; p=.429) and was reliable at retest (ICC=.82). Moreover, baseline MoCA scores predicted the ECAS at retest. RCIs were successfully derived – with baseline MoCA scores being the only significant predictor of retest performances (ps<.001). Conclusions. As long as motor disabilities do not undermine its applicability, the MoCA appears to be longitudinally feasible at a 5-to-10-month interval in non-demented ALS patients. However, ALS-specific screeners – such as the ECAS – should be preferred whenever possible.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?