Abstract:We argue that the quantum probability law follows, in the large N limit, from the compatibility of quantum mechanics with classical-like properties of macroscopic objects. For a finite sample, we find that likely and unlikely measurement outcomes are associated with distinct interference effects in a sample weakly coupled to an environment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Can the laws of quantum probability be derived from the classical properties of macroscopic objects?**
Specifically, the author explores how to derive the laws of quantum probability through the consistency between macroscopic and microscopic measurements in a large number of identical systems (such as spins). The following are the main content and conclusions of the paper:
### Research Background and Problem Statement
1. **Probabilistic Nature of Quantum Theory**
- Quantum mechanics is essentially probabilistic. But is there a fundamental physical principle that determines the form of the laws of quantum probability?
- The author believes that for a large number of identical non - entangled spin systems, their collective behavior can exhibit properties similar to classical objects.
2. **Comparison of Macroscopic and Microscopic Measurement Methods**
- Macroscopic measurement method: Measure the collective properties of the entire system (such as the total magnetic moment) without directly detecting the state of a single spin.
- Microscopic measurement method: Measure the properties of each spin separately and calculate the average value.
### Main Arguments and Derivation Processes
1. **Collective Behavior in the Large - N Limit**
- When the number of spins \( N \) in the system approaches infinity, the state of the system will become an eigenstate of the collective operator (such as the magnetic moment \( M_x \)).
- In this case, the result of the macroscopic measurement is deterministic, and the perturbation to each spin is very small.
2. **Derivation of the Laws of Quantum Probability**
- For a finite but sufficiently large \( N \), assuming that the physical laws are stable against small perturbations, the laws of quantum probability can be derived by comparing the results of macroscopic and microscopic measurements.
- Specifically, for a system with an initial state \( |\psi\rangle = c_+ |+\rangle + c_- |-\rangle \), the pointer shift in the macroscopic measurement is:
\[
\bar{\sigma}_x = |c_+|^2 (+1)+|c_-|^2 (-1)
\]
- The average value of the microscopic measurement should be consistent with the result of the macroscopic measurement:
\[
\lim_{N \to \infty} F_N=\bar{\sigma}_x
\]
3. **Consistency between Macroscopic and Microscopic Measurements**
- Macroscopic measurement hardly perturbs the system, while microscopic measurement randomizes the state of the system.
- In order to maintain consistency, the frequency distribution of the microscopic measurement must conform to the laws of quantum probability.
4. **Stability and Small - Perturbation Assumption**
- For a finite but sufficiently large \( N \), it is assumed that the results of physical experiments are stable against small perturbations.
- This means that even if there are small perturbations, the change in the probability law will not exceed the order of \( O(1/\sqrt{N}) \).
### Conclusions
- The author shows how to derive the laws of quantum probability through the consistency between macroscopic and microscopic measurements.
- For a finite sample, assuming the stability of physical laws against small perturbations can further derive the laws of quantum probability.
- The research also reveals the difference between "possible" and "impossible" measurement results at the microscopic level, which is manifested as different interference effects.
### Summary of Mathematical Formulas
- Collective state:
\[
|\Psi\rangle = |\psi\rangle_1 |\psi\rangle_2\cdots |\psi\rangle_N
\]
- Collective magnetic moment:
\[
\vec{M}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i = 1}^N\vec{\sigma}_i
\]
- Commutation relation in the large - N limit:
\[
\lim_{N \to \infty}[M_x, M_y]=i\lim_{N \to \infty}\frac{M_z}{N} = 0
\]
- Spin operator action:
\[
\sigma |\psi\rangle=\bar{\sigma} |\psi\rangle+\Delta \sigma |\psi_\perp\rangle
\]