The effect of an antioxidant gel compared to chlorhexidine during the soft tissue healing process: An animal study

Kelechi Ukaegbu,Deborah Foyle,Xianghong Luan,Emet Schneiderman,Edward P. Allen,Jacqueline Plemons,Kathy K. H. Svoboda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.23-0794
2024-06-04
Journal of Periodontology
Abstract:Background Prolonged inflammation and oxidative stress can impede healing. To enhance healing efficiency, many solutions have been employed. This is an in vivo study comparing chlorhexidine (CHX) to a commercial antioxidant gel (AO). Methods Envelope flaps were created in the lower incisor gingival region of 60 Sprague–Dawley rats, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was inserted. Animals were randomly assigned to postsurgical treatment application of AO gel or 0.12% CHX twice daily. A control group received no postsurgical treatment. Data collected (before surgery, 24 h, and 72 h) included surgical images, tissue samples, and weights. Blinded scorers assessed images using a wound healing scale. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) was used for gene expression of tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNFα), interleukin‐1 (IL‐1), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Results The AO group scored higher than the CHX and control groups in clinical evaluation (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?