Bivalent RSVpreF Vaccine in Adults 18 to <60 Years Old With High-Risk Conditions

Matthew Davis,William Towner,Elliot DeHaan,Qin Jiang,Wen Li,Farah Rahman,Michael Patton,Hayley Wyper,Maria Maddalena Lino,Uzma N Sarwar,Zaynah Majid-Mahomed,Saumil Mehta,William Howitt,Kevin Cannon,Elena Kalinina,David Cooper,Kena A Swanson,Annaliesa S Anderson,Alejandra Gurtman,Iona Munjal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae550
IF: 20.999
2024-11-13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Background Older individuals and adults with certain chronic or immunocompromising health conditions are at increased risk of severe RSV disease. Methods In this phase 3 randomized trial of RSVpreF safety and immunogenicity in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease, participants were randomized 2:1 to 1 RSVpreF (120 μg) or placebo dose. Primary safety endpoints included reactogenicity events and adverse events (AEs) through 7 days and 1 month after vaccination, respectively, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) throughout the study. In primary analyses, immunogenicity elicited 1 month after RSVpreF was bridged to a randomly selected subset of ≥60-year-olds receiving RSVpreF from the immunogenicity subset in the pivotal phase 3 RENOIR trial, which demonstrated RSVpreF efficacy. Noninferiority was declared if 95% CI lower bounds were >0.667 (neutralizing titer adjusted geometric mean ratios) and >−10% (seroresponse rate differences) for RSV-A and RSV-B. Results Overall, 678 participants received RSVpreF (n=453) or placebo (n=225). Most reactogenicity events were mild/moderate; severe events occurred in ≤2.0% of participants overall. AE frequencies were similar in RSVpreF (7.1%) and placebo recipients (7.6%). No vaccine-related SAEs or NDCMCs were reported. One month after RSVpreF administration, noninferiority criteria were met in 18−59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titers and seroresponse rates. Conclusion RSVpreF was well tolerated with no safety concerns and demonstrated immunobridging to efficacy in 18−59-year-olds at high-risk of severe RSV disease versus ≥60-year-olds in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated, supporting use of RSVpreF to prevent RSV-associated disease in this population. NCT05842967.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?