Abstract:Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. 'feeling', 'knowing' and 'effort') are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.

On a Physical Metatheory of Consciousness

Understanding Physical Processes in Describing a State of Consciousness: A Review

Non-Separability of Physical Systems as a Foundation of Consciousness

The Closure of the Physical, Consciousness and Scientific Practice

The Finer Scale of Consciousness: Quantum Theory

Quantum mechanics, objective reality, and the problem of consciousness

On Universal Physical Reality in the Light of Quantum Consciousness

Quantum information theoretic approach to the mind-brain problem

A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness

Embodied Consciousness Theory

Quantum information in neural systems

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

Consciousness and the Problem of Quantum Measurement

ON THE FEATURES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF QUANTUM INFORMATION

Testing the Conjecture That Quantum Processes Create Conscious Experience

The meta-problem and the transfer of knowledge between theories of consciousness: a software engineer's take

Causal potency of consciousness in the physical world

Consciousness as a state of matter

Inner privacy of conscious experiences and quantum information

Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness (and the other way around)

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction