Abstract:We show the following unconditional results on quantum commitments in two related yet different models: 1. We revisit the notion of quantum auxiliary-input commitments introduced by Chailloux, Kerenidis, and Rosgen (Comput. Complex. 2016) where both the committer and receiver take the same quantum state, which is determined by the security parameter, as quantum auxiliary inputs. We show that computationally-hiding and statistically-binding quantum auxiliary-input commitments exist unconditionally, i.e., without relying on any unproven assumption, while Chailloux et al. assumed a complexity-theoretic assumption, ${\bf QIP}\not\subseteq{\bf QMA}$. On the other hand, we observe that achieving both statistical hiding and statistical binding at the same time is impossible even in the quantum auxiliary-input setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of unconditionally proving computational security of any form of (classical or quantum) commitments for which statistical security is impossible. As intermediate steps toward our construction, we introduce and unconditionally construct post-quantum sparse pseudorandom distributions and quantum auxiliary-input EFI pairs which may be of independent interest. 2. We introduce a new model which we call the common reference quantum state (CRQS) model where both the committer and receiver take the same quantum state that is randomly sampled by an efficient setup algorithm. We unconditionally prove that there exist statistically hiding and statistically binding commitments in the CRQS model, circumventing the impossibility in the plain model. We also discuss their applications to zero-knowledge proofs, oblivious transfers, and multi-party computations.

Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is simply possible

BeppoSAX observations of the X-ray binary pulsar 4U1626-67

Reexamination of Quantum Bit Commitment: the Possible and the Impossible

Another simple unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment protocol -- beating entanglement with entanglement

Is entanglement necessary to have unconditional security in quantum bit commitment ?

Secure Bit Commitment Based on Quantum One-Way Function

Unconditionally Secure Commitments with Quantum Auxiliary Inputs

Quantum Bit Escrow

An Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Protocol

Comment on "A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment"

Quantum Bit Commitment Using Entangled States

The existance of unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment

Quantum Bit String Commitment

Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Using Unstable Particles

Experimental Unconditionally Secure Bit Commitment

Optimal bounds for quantum bit commitment

Counterfactual Quantum Bit Commitment

Unconditionally Secure Relativistic Quantum Qubit Commitment

Quantum key distribution based on orthogonal states allows secure quantum bit commitment

Security bound of cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment

Unconditionally secure quantum commitments with preprocessing