Abstract:Quantum theory famously entails the existence of incompatible measurements, pairs of system observables which cannot be simultaneously measured to arbitrary precision. Incompatibility is widely regarded to be a uniquely quantum phenomenon, linked to failure to commute of quantum operators. Even in the face of deep parallels between quantum commutators and classical Poisson brackets, no connection has been established between the Poisson algebra and any intrinsic limitations to classical measurement. Here I examine measurement in classical Hamiltonian physics as a process involving the joint evolution of an object-system and a finite-temperature measuring apparatus. Instead of the ideal measurement capable of extracting information without disturbing the system, I find a Heisenberg-like precision-disturbance relation: Measuring an observable leaves all Poisson-commuting observables undisturbed but inevitably disturbs all non-Poisson-commuting observables. In this classical uncertainty relation the role of h-bar is played by an apparatus-specific quantity, q-bar. While this is not a universal constant, the analysis suggests that q-bar takes a finite positive value for any apparatus that can be built. (Specifically: q-bar vanishes in the model only in the unreachable limit of zero absolute temperature.) I show that a classical version of Ozawa's model of quantum measurement [Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 , 385 (1988)], originally proposed as a means to violate Heisenberg's relation, does not violate the classical relation. If this result were to generalize to all models of measurement, then incompatibility would prove to be a feature not only of quantum, but of classical physics too. Put differently: The approach presented here points the way to studying the (Bayesian) epistemology of classical physics, which was until now assumed to be trivial. It now seems possible that it is nontrivial and bears a resemblance to the quantum formalism. The present findings may be of interest to researchers working on foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly for ψ -epistemic interpretations. More practically, there may be applications in the fields of precision measurement, nanoengineering, and molecular machines. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024124 ©2024 American Physical Society

On the nature of continuous physical quantities in classical and quantum mechanics

The continuous and the discrete on the history

Taking Heisenberg's Potentia Seriously

Continuous quantum measurement and the quantum to classical transition

Quantum Mechanics and Experience

We just cannot have classical and quantum behavior at the same TIME

Process, System, Causality, and Quantum Mechanics, A Psychoanalysis of Animal Faith

The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces

Intrinsic and extrinsic properties of quantum systems

Space-Time in Quantum Theory

Quantum Mechanics in a New Light

From classical to quantum models: the regularising role of integrals, symmetry and probabilities

A Model of Classical and Quantum Measurement

"In Mathematical Language": On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations

Position as an independent variable and the emergence of the $1/2$-time fractional derivative in quantum mechanics

On the Equivalence Principle of Quantum Mechanics

Incompatible observables in classical physics: A closer look at measurement in Hamiltonian mechanics

Remarks on unsharp quantum observables, objectification, and modal interpretations

Quantum Mechanics in Curved Space(time) with a Noncommutative Geometric Perspective

The Logic of Identity: Distinguishability and Indistinguishability in Classical and Quantum Physics

Completely Discretized, Finite Quantum Mechanics