Abstract P3-13-06: A prospective phase II trial of vinorelbine plus oxaliplatin in second- or third-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Zhen Wang,Jun Zhang,Leiping Wang,X. Hu,Biyun Wang,Junning Cao,F. Lv,C. Zhen,Su-shan Zhang,Z. Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS13-P3-13-06
2013-12-15
Abstract:Purpose: Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Previous study showed biweekly combination of vinorelbine and oxaliplatin (NVBOX) at doses of 30 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively, is highly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this study (NCT 01528826) was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of NVBOX in second- or third-line mTNBC. Methods: Eligible patients were female with 18–70 years old and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1, and had mTNBC that had progressed after 1or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. A period of 4 weeks (NVBOX twice) was considered as one treatment cycle and the maximum cycles were 6. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: Between Dec 2011 and Nov 2012, forty-four patients were recruited [median age 47; 77.3% with viceral metastasis, 100% had been exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes; 56.8% cis/carbo-platin pretreated for MBC; 38.6% with time to progression (TTP) of 1-2 previous regimens before recruitment ≤ 3 months]. The overall response rate was 31.6% (1 complete response, 11 partial responses) and 10 achieved stable diseases (7 lasting more than 6 months) in 38 evaluable patients. After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, the median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI, 3.6–5.0) months and 12.6 (95% CI, 8.1–17.0) months, respectively. PFS was significantly shorter in patients with disease free interval (DFI) ≤ 1year (HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.05–4.21; P = 0.037) and TTP of 1-2 previous regimens before recruitment ≤ 3 months (HR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.66–6.89; P Conclusion: We conclude that biweekly NVBOX regimen is effective with a good safety profile in the second- or third-line mTNBC, which warrants further investigation in a phase III study. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-06.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?