Automated Writing Evaluation in Language Teaching: Theory, Development, and Application

V. Hegelheimer,A. Dursun,Zhi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.V33I1.29251
2015-01-12
Abstract:The first automated writing evaluation (AWE) software for assessment purposes dates back to the 1960s when Page Ellis developed Project Essay Grade (PEG). Rapid advances in the fields of artificial intelligence and Natural Language Processing (NLP) in the last few decades have led to the development of more powerful commercial scoring engines, such as e-rater, developed by ETS, IntelliMetric by Vantage Learning, and Intelligent Essay Assessor (IEA) by Pearson Education. Recent years have seen the application of these scoring engines expanding to language learning and teaching contexts (i.e., Criterion, WriteToLearn, MyAccess!). Opinions on the utility of AWE tools and their potential effects on educational practices vary, as shown by two frequently-cited books on AWE: Ericsson and Haswell (2006) and Shermis and Burstein (2013). While many AWE tools are promising with reportedly high reliability, the use of AWE in writing classrooms has provoked heated discussion and strong opposition, as articulated in the 2004 position statement of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC). Most recently, Chapelle, Cotos, and Lee (2015) have proposed a new, argument-based approach to evaluating the use of AWE-based assessments. In general, more studies are needed to evaluate the use of AWE tools in classrooms and beyond. This Special Issue intends to extend the discussion by bringing together a variety of studies related to
Computer Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?