Abstract:The Bonferroni Q test is widely used in empirical studies investigating predictability in asset returns by strongly persistent and endogenous predictors. Its formulation, however, only allows for a constant mean in the predictor, seemingly at odds with many of the predictors used in practice. We establish the asymptotic size and local power properties of the Q test, and the corresponding Bonferroni t ‐test, under a local‐to‐zero specification for a linear trend in the predictor, revealing that size and power depend on the magnitude of the trend for both. To rectify this, we develop with‐trend variants of the operational Bonferroni Q and t tests. However, where a trend is not present in the predictor, we show that these tests lose (both finite sample and asymptotic local) power relative to the extant constant‐only versions of the tests. In practice, uncertainty will necessarily exist over whether a linear trend is genuinely present in the predictor or not. To deal with this, we also develop hybrid tests based on union‐of‐rejections and switching mechanisms to capitalise on the relative power advantages of the constant‐only tests when a trend is absent (or very weak) and the with‐trend tests otherwise. A further extension allows the use of a conventional t ‐test where the predictor appears to be weakly persistent. We show that, overall, our recommended hybrid test can offer excellent size and power properties regardless of whether or not a linear trend is present in the predictor, or the predictor's degrees of persistence and endogeneity. An empirical application illustrates the practical relevance of our new approach.JEL Classifications: C22, C12, G14

A New Test for Multiple Predictive Regression

A new portmanteau test for predictive regression models with possible embedded endogeneity

Predictive ability tests with possibly overlapping models

A joint test of predictability and structural break in predictive regressions

Penalized Independence Rule for Testing High-Dimensional Hypotheses

A Unified Inference for Predictive Quantile Regression

Bonferroni‐Type Tests for Return Predictability With Possibly Trending Predictors

Characteristic Function-Based Testing for Multifactor Continuous-Time Markov Models Via Nonparametric Regression

Empirical Likelihood Based Tests for Detecting the Presence of Significant Predictors in Marginal Quantile Regression

Predictability of Equity Returns over Different Time Horizons: A Nonparametric Approach

Testing covariates in high-dimensional regression

Balanced Predictive Regressions

Testing Predictor Significance with Ultra High Dimensional Multivariate Responses

Generalized Spectral Tests for Conditional Mean Models in Time Series with Conditional Heteroscedasticity of Unknown Form

Specification Tests for Time-Varying Coefficient Models

Robust Multiple Testing under High-dimensional Dynamic Factor Model

A Heteroscedasticity-Robust Overidentifying Restriction Test with High-Dimensional Covariates

Testing for improvement in prediction model performance

On Testing Time Series Momentum Using Predictive Regressions

A New Multiple Testing Method in the Dependent Case

Correlation‐based tests of predictability