Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. METHODS Randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for colorectal carcinoma from January 2000 to October 2010 were searched in the databases of EMbase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Sciencedirect, Springer, VIP, CNKI, CBMdisc. The methodological quality was assessed according to the standard of Cochrane systematic review. For homogeneous studies, RevMan5.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 13 RCTs involving 4603 patients were included in this study, and among those 6 were multi-center randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis showed that: the operation time of the LS group was longer than that of the OS group (WMD = 38.91, 95%CI: 33.89 - 43.93, P < 0.001), the blood loss (WMD = -138.14, 95%CI: -195.79 - -80.50, P < 0.001) and the length of hospital stay (WMD = 2.91, 95%CI: -4.65 - -1.17, P = 0.001) of the LS group was less than those in OS group. There was no significant differences between the two groups in the number of dissected lymph nodes (WMD = -0.62, 95%CI: -1.47 - 0.23, P = 0.150). There was no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the postoperative complications (30 days) (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.59 - 1.01, P = 0.06). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 3-year overall survival (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.96 - 1.04, P = 0.970). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.99 - 1.08, P = 0.140). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year overall recurrence (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.74 - 1.07, P = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma is a safe and effective therapy as open surgery in the short term or long term outcomes. It could be an acceptable alternative to open surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Comparison study of laparoscopic (LAP) surgery vs. open surgery (OS) for descending colon cancer

Laparoscopic and Open Left Hemicolectomy for Descending Colon Cancer

Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Vs Open Right Hemicolectomy for Right Colon Cancer

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for colon cancer

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

[The Efficiency and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Carcinoma: a Systematic Review].

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer:A Comparative Study

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Short-term effects of laparoscopic radical colectomy versus open surgery radical colectomy for colon cancer patients

Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy:A Non-Randomized Comparative Study

Clinical control study of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer]

Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: a single center retrospective case-control study

The efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy versus that of open hemicolectomy for right colon carcinoma

Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer.

Single centre controlled study on short and long term effects of laparoscopic vs. open radical rectectomy and colectomy for colorectal cancer

Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Segmentectomy.

Effect of Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Through Medial Approach on Colon Cancer

Clinical analysis of 48 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment

Comparison of laparoscopic and open colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis