Abstract:Objective Through the prospective comparative study of laparoscopic-assistcd and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer,to evaluate the safety,feasibility,radical and postoperative short-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy.Methods From May 2010 to December 2011,29 gastric cancer patients matching the inclusion criteria were chosen as the laparoscopic group.According to the same inclusion criteria,29 gastric cancer patients with the same or similar clinical T stage (AJCC 7th edition) were extracted as the open group.Then the two groups information was carried out a comparative study.Results The mean operation time of the laparoscopic group was longer[(210.34 ± 44.76) min vs (151.55 ± 42.28) min,P =0.000] and the mean hospitalization costs were higher[(61 251 ±17 226) yuan vs (52 016 ±27 767) yuan,P=0.000],while the mean incision length was shorter[(5.83 ± 1.10) cm vs (15.93 ± 1.39) cm,P =O.000] than the open group.There was no significant difference on blood loss,of dissected lymph nodes number,proximal and distal resection margins,the first flatus time,the first liquid diet time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications and cumulative survival rates between the two groups.Conclusion The laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible,can achieve equivalent radical and short-term efficacy with the open surgery. Key words: Stomach neoplasms ; Carcinoma; Laparoscopes ; Prospective studies

Prospective comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer