Solid self-emulsifying drug delivery system (Solid SEDDS) for testosterone undecanoate: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Xi Liang,Yabing Hua,Qian Liu,Zhiguo Li,Fang-lin Yu,Jing Gao,Hui Zhang,Aiping Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201817666200904172626
2020-09-04
Current Drug Delivery
Abstract:OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to investigate the potential of solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (solid SEDDS) loaded with testosterone undecanoate (TU) (solid TU-SEDDS). The solid TU-SEDDS was composed of TU, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT, oil), 2-Chloro-1-(chloromethyl) ethyl carbamate (EL-35, surfactant) and polyethylene glycol (PEG400, cosurfactant). It was expected to improve the dissolution and oral bioavailability of TU, as a result of investigating the feasibility of clinical application of SEDDS. METHODS First, a TU-SEDDS was developed by using rational blends of components with good solubilizing ability for TU. Next, a ternary phase diagram was constructed to determine the self-emulsifying region, and the formulation was optimized. Then, the solid TU-SEDDS formulation was established by screening suitable solid adsorptions. Finally, the prepared SEDDS, TU-SEDDS and solid TU-SEDDS formulations were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS The size of the solid TU-SEDDS was 189.1 ± 0.23 nm. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results showed that the oil droplets were homogenous and spherical with good integrity. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) results indicated that the solid TU-SEDDS formulation almost preserves the amorphous state. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that neusilin US2 successfully adsorbed the TU-SEDDS. Drug release indicated that the dissolution of the solid TU-SEDDS was faster than that of Andriol Testocaps®. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the solid TU-SEDDS (487.54±208.80 µg/L×h) was higher than that of Andriol Testocaps® (418.93±273.52 µg/L×h, P < 0.05). In beagles not fed a high-fat diet, the AUC of the solid TU-SEDDS (5.81±4.03 µg/L×h) was higher than that of Andriol Testocaps® (5.53±3.43 µg/L×h, P > 0.05). In beagles fed a high-fat diet, the AUC of the solid TU-SEDDS (38.18±21.90 µg/L×h) was higher than that of Andriol Testocaps® (37.17±13.79 µg/L×h, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION According to the results of this research, oral solid TU-SEDDS is expected to be another alternative delivery system for the late-onset hypogonadism. This is beneficial to the transformation of existing drug delivery systems into preclinical and clinical studies.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?