Abstract TP316: Urban Crural Comparisons of Treatments and Outcomes for Ischemic Cerebrovascular Diseases

Chunjuan Wang,Zixiao Li,H. Gu,Yong Jiang,Xia Meng,Hao Li,Yongjun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.51.SUPPL_1.TP316
IF: 10.17
2020-02-01
Stroke
Abstract: Background: Little is known about healthcare quality and patient outcomes of ischemic cerebrovascular diseases between urban and rural areas in China during the past decade. Methods: We used a two-stage random sampling method to create a nationally representative sample of patients in China hospitalized for ischemic stroke (IS)/ Transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 2005, 2010, and 2015. Firstly, we used simple random sampling to obtain a list of participating hospitals in 2 urban and 3 rural strata. Secondly, we obtained medical records at each hospital on clinical profiles, tests, treatments and outcomes using a systematic sampling approach. We weighted our findings to explore rural-urban disparities from 2005 to 2015. Results: A total of 30 827 patients were sampled from 189 hospitals with 14 418 (46.8%) from urban and 16 409 (53.2%) from rural. We observed a decreased disparity between urban and rural in eligible patients receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation (AF) (both P trend <0.0001), a diminished disparity of statins use by 2015 (70.9% in urban versus 69.9% in rural; P=0.1852) and an emerging disparity of antihypertensive treatment (P trend <0.0001). The disparities of composite score of tests (from 0.24 in urban vs 0.18 in rural to 0.30 in urban vs 0.33 in rural, P trend <0.0001) and in-hospital treatments (from 0.45 in urban vs 0.49 in rural to 0.70 in urban vs 0.69 in rural, P trend <0.0001) were all decreased from 2005 to 2015. In-hospital mortality have both decreased significantly in urban or rural areas, the adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality in urban was higher than rural in both 2005 (OR [95% CI]: 2.26 [1.12-4.55], p=0.0223) and 2015 (OR [95% CI]: 2.64 [1.30-5.36], p=0.0070), however, the trend of disparity was not significant (P for interaction =0.9527). Conclusion: Although urban-rural disparities in evidence-based treatments for IS/TIA patients have largely been eliminated, substantial gaps in quality of care persist in both settings.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?