ddPCR: a more sensitive and accurate tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low viral load specimens

T. Suo,Xinjin Liu,M. Guo,Jiangpeng Feng,Wenjia Hu,Yang Yang,Qiuhan Zhang,Xin Wang,M. Sajid,Dong Guo,Zhi-xiang Huang,Liping Deng,Tie-long Chen,Fang Liu,Ke Xu,Yuan Liu,Qi Zhang,Yingle Liu,Yong Xiong,Guozhong Guo,Yu Chen,K. Lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.29.20029439

2020-03-06

MedRxiv

Abstract:Background: Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. However, due to the low viral load in patient throat and the limitation of RT-PCR, significant numbers of false negative reports are inevitable, which should not be ignored. Methods: We explored the feasibility of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect SARS-CoV-2 from 57 clinical pharyngeal swab samples and compared with RT-PCR in terms of the sensitivity and accuracy. Among 57 samples, all of which were reported as negative nucleic acid by officially approved clinical RT-PCR detection, 43 samples were collected from suspected patients with fever in clinic, and 14 were from supposed convalescents who were about to discharge after treatment. The experiment was double-blind. Results: The lower limit of detection of the optimized ddPCR is at least 500 times lower than that of RT-PCR. The overall accuracy of ddPCR for clinical detection is 94.3 %. 33 out of 35 negative pharyngeal swab samples checked by RT-PCR were correctly judged by ddPCR based on the follow-up investigation. In addition, 9 out of 14 (64.2 %) supposed convalescents with negative nucleic acid test twice by RT-PCR were positive by ddPCR detection. Conclusions: ddPCR shows superiority for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2 to reduce the false negatives, which could be a powerful complement to the current standard RT-PCR. Before the ddPCR to be approved for diagnosis, the current clinical practice that the convalescent continues to be quarantined for 2 weeks is reasonable and necessary.

Medicine