Exploring the Potential of Miller Cycle with and without EGR for Maximum Efficiency and Minimum Exhaust Emissions in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine

W. Guan,Vinícius B Pedrozo,Xinyan Wang,Hua Zhao,Z. Ban,Tiejian Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/03-12-05-0037

2019-09-03

SAE International Journal of Engines

Abstract:6 In order to improve the fuel conversion efficiency and meet more stringent exhaust emissions 7 regulations, Miller cycle and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) have been researched as separate 8 means to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) and pollutant emissions from the internal combustion 9 engines. In this paper, an experimental work was carried out to explore the potential benefits 10 of Miller cycle operation via late intake valve closing (LIVC) with and without EGR in a single 11 cylinder heavy-duty (HD) diesel engine equipped with a variable valve actuation (VVA) 12 system. The overall engine-out emissions, fuel conversion efficiency, and estimated urea 13 consumption in the selective catalyst reduction (SCR) aftertreatment were analysed and 14 compared over the World Harmonized Stationary Cycle (WHSC) for different combustion 15 control strategies. Additionally, the potential of Miller cycle with and without EGR based on 16 the “SCR-only” and “SCR + EGR” technical routes to meet the Euro VI nitrogen oxides (NOx) 17 limit of 0.4 g/kWh was assessed at different NOx aftertreatment efficiencies. 18 When considering the urea consumption in the SCR, the results showed that the introduction 19 of EGR allowed for an engine operation with higher corrected net indicated efficiency (NIEcorr.) 20 or lower specific total fluid consumption than the baseline cases without EGR due to the 21 relatively lower engine-out NOx emissions. However, the use of EGR adversely affected soot 22 and CO emissions when operating with constant intake pressure (Pint) of the baseline case. The 23 application of Miller cycle with and without EGR strategies decreased the net indicated 24 efficiency (NIE) and NIEcorr. when operating with the same Pint of the baseline operation. The 25 use of higher Pint helped to improve upon the NIE and NIEcorr. of the Miller cycle cases. The 26 WHSC cycle-averaged analysis showed that different combustion and engine control 27 technologies can be adopted with and without EGR to meet Euro VI NOx limit. A conventional 28 baseline engine operation without EGR would require a high SCR efficiency of 96% in order 29 to curb a cycle-averaged NOx emissions level of 10 g/kWh. Miller cycle operation without 30 EGR achieved the optimum NIEcorr. at the cycle-averaged NOx level of 8 g/kWh. When 31 increasing the Pint, this strategy enabled an increase of 2.6% in the NIEcorr. and reduced the 32 required SCR efficiency to 93.5%, but with a penalty on the NIE of 3.3% when controlling the 33 cycle-averaged NOx level at 6.5 g/kWh. Alternatively, Miller cycle operation with EGR and 34 higher Pint allowed for a cycle-averaged NOx levels of 4.0 g/kWh, decreased the total fluid 35 consumption by 8% and minimised the required SCR efficiency to 90%. Therefore, this study 36 has presented promising cost-effective emission control and fuel efficiency technologies that 37 could be suitable for the “SCR-only” and “SCR + EGR” technical routes for the future HD 38 diesel engines. 39

Environmental Science