Abstract:With the introduction of neuron coverage as a testing criterion for deep neural networks (DNNs), covering more neurons to detect more internal logic of DNNs became the main goal of many research studies. While some works had made progress, some new challenges for testing methods based on neuron coverage had been proposed, mainly as establishing better neuron selection and activation strategies influenced not only obtaining higher neuron coverage, but also more testing efficiency, validating testing results automatically, labeling generated test cases to extricate manual work, and so on. In this article, we put forward Test4Deep, an effective white-box testing DNN approach based on neuron coverage. It is based on a differential testing framework to automatically verify inconsistent DNNs' behavior. We designed a strategy that can track inactive neurons and constantly triggered them in each iteration to maximize neuron coverage. Furthermore, we devised an optimization function that guided the DNN under testing to deviate predictions between the original input and generated test data and dominated unobservable generation perturbations to avoid manually checking test oracles. We conducted comparative experiments with two state-of-the-art white-box testing methods DLFuzz and DeepXplore. Empirical results on three popular datasets with nine DNNs demonstrated that compared to DLFuzz and DeepXplore, Test4Deep, on average, exceeded by 32.87% and 35.69% in neuron coverage, while reducing 58.37% and 53.24% testing time, respectively. In the meantime, Test4Deep also produced 58.37% and 53.24% more test cases with 23.81% and 98.40% fewer perturbations. Even compared with the two highest neuron coverage strategies of DLFuzz, Test4Deep still enhanced neuron coverage by 4.34% and 23.23% and achieved 94.48% and 85.67% higher generation time efficiency. Furthermore, Test4Deep could improve the accuracy and robustness of DNNs by merging generated test cases and retraining.

DeepHunter: a coverage-guided fuzz testing framework for deep neural networks

Coverage Guided Differential Adversarial Testing of Deep Learning Systems

There is Limited Correlation Between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

An Empirical Study on Correlation between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

HashC: Making deep learning coverage testing finer and faster

Feature Map Testing for Deep Neural Networks

DeepCov: Coverage Guided Deep Learning Framework Fuzzing

HashC: Making DNNs' Coverage Testing Finer and Faster.

FDFuzz: Applying Feature Detection to Fuzz Deep Learning Systems

DeepCNP: an Efficient White-Box Testing of Deep Neural Networks by Aligning Critical Neuron Paths

A First Look at the Effect of Deep Learning in Coverage-guided Fuzzing

DLFuzz: Differential Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systems.

A White-Box Testing for Deep Neural Networks Based on Neuron Coverage.

DeepEvolution: A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Neural Networks

Deep Learning-Based Hybrid Fuzz Testing

Graph-based Fuzz Testing for Deep Learning Inference Engines

Graph-Based Fuzz Testing for Deep Learning Inference Engine

CAGFuzz: Coverage-Guided Adversarial Generative Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systems

Test4Deep: an Effective White-Box Testing for Deep Neural Networks

DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systems

DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Cars