Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between CEOs' inside debt holdings (pension benefits and deferred compensation) and the operating leverage of the firms they manage, with the aim to examine whether CEO incentives play a role in corporate risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate the relation between CEO inside debt holdings (CIDH) (pension benefits and deferred compensation) and the operating leverage (DOL) of the firms they manage. Using a sample of 11,145 US firm-year observations over the period 2006–2017, the authors find a strong negative association between CIDH and DOL. Additional analyses reveal that the relationship between CIDH and DOL is more pronounced in firms with heightened agency issues, powerful CEOs and for CEOs with stronger professional networks. The results are robust to various sensitivity and endogeneity tests. Findings The authors find strong evidence confirming the expected negative association between CEO inside debt and DOL suggesting that firms with higher inside debt tend to maintain lower levels of operating leverage. These findings continue to hold with the alternative measure for the inside debt and operating leverage, and across a range of tests designed to rule out the possibility that the primary findings are in any way driven by potential endogeneity. In addition, the findings demonstrate that the presence of manager-shareholder agency conflicts can strengthen the inside debt–DOL relationship suggesting the strong role of inside debt in reducing firm risk. Research limitations/implications Findings in this paper have implications for design of compensation structures so that corporate boards can establish incentives as a tool for risk management. A limitation of this study is that it is focused on one market, i.e. US listed companies, so the findings may not be applicable on a global scale. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that links firm-level management of operating leverage through design of CEO inside debt incentives (two obvious choices for risk-reduction at the CEOs’ disposal include reducing financial risk through reduction of firm leverage and reducing operating risk through reduction of operating leverage). While use of firm leverage as an instrument of choice has been explored in the past, use of operating leverage to achieve risk reduction when CEO possess high inside holding, has received very little attention.

Accounting-Based Compensation Contracts, the Cost of Borrowing, and the Structure of Corporate Debt Contracts

Non-executive Ownership and Private Loan Pricing

Creditor Rights and LBOs

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

CEO Pay Duration and Corporate Debt Maturity Structure

Duration of executive compensation and maturity structure of corporate debt

CEO Compensation Risk and Timely Loss Recognition

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Executive Compensation and Corporate Debt Policy and Monitoring

Capital structure and executive compensation contract design: A theoretical and empirical analysis

Corporate Boards and the Leverage and Debt Maturity Choices

Skilled Labor and Bank Loan Contracting

CEO tax burden and debt contracting

Essays on Executive Compensation

The Impact of Clawback Adoption on Executive Cash Compensation Structure

Proxy contests and debt contracting behavior: The interplay of managerial, shareholder, and creditor incentives

Refinancing Risk , Managerial Risk Shifting , and Debt Covenants : An Empirical Analysis ∗

Do CEO risk-reducing incentives affect operating leverage? Evidence from CEO inside debt holdings

The Impact of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1 on Corporate Financing: A Debt Contracting Perspective

Real versus accounting earnings management: The effect of performance measure timing constraints

Lease Financing and Corporate Governance