How Structural and Contextual Mechanisms Contribute to Organizational Ambidexterity: Examine Middle Managers’ Role in Knowledge Inflows Management

Jie Xiong
2011-01-01
Abstract:Organizations successfully addressing the situation of exploiting existing competencies and exploring new ones are ambidextrous. To examine how firms may reach ambidexterity, majority of literature emphasize either structural or contextual mechanisms in balancing conflicting demands and activities. However, there is little conceptual synthesis of how organizations can use both structural mechanisms (differentiation and integration) and contextual mechanisms (processes of discipline, stretch, trust and support) to reach ambidexterity from knowledge inflows management perspective. I conceptualize knowledge inflows management of a well-known Chinese telecommunication equipment provider company, Huawei, at middle management level, in facing conflicting demands. Findings show that middle managers implement some extent of both structural and contextual mechanisms to manage different patterns of knowledge inflows to achieve ambidexterity, in terms of pro-profit and pro-growth.
Business
What problem does this paper attempt to address?