Abstract:This paper addresses the issue of modelling the uncertainty about the value of continuous soil attributes, at any particular unsampled location (local uncertainty) as well as jointly over several locations (multiple-point or spatial uncertainty). Two approaches are presented: kriging-based and simulation-based techniques that can be implemented within a parametric (e.g. multi-Gaussian) or non-parametric (indicator) frameworks. As expected in theory and illustrated by case studies, the two approaches yield similar models of local uncertainty, yet the simulation-based approach has several advantages over kriging: (1) it provides a model of spatial uncertainty, e.g. the probability that a given threshold is exceeded jointly at several locations can be readily computed, (2) conditional cumulative distribution function (ccdf) for supports larger than the measurement support (e.g. remediation units or flow simulator cells) can be numerically approximated by the cumulative distribution of block simulated values that are obtained by averaging values simulated within the block, and (3) the set of realizations allows one to study the propagation of uncertainty through global GIS operations or complex transfer functions, such as flow simulators that consider many locations simultaneously rather than one at a time.The other issue is the evaluation of the quality or “goodness” of uncertainty models. Two new criteria (exceedence probability plot and narrowness of probability intervals that include the true values) are presented to assess the accuracy and precision of local uncertainty models using cross-validation. According to the second criterion, multi-Gaussian kriging performs better than indicator kriging for the hydraulic conductivity (HC) data set. However, looking at the distribution of flow simulator responses, sequential indicator simulation (sis) yields better results than sequential Gaussian simulation (sGs) that does not allow for significant correlation of extreme values (destructuration effect).

Assessing models for estimation and methods for uncertainty quantification for spatial return levels

Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Modeling of Extreme Hydrological Events

Assessing the Performance of the Independence Method in Modeling Spatial Extreme Rainfall

Uncertainty in High and Low Flows Due to Model Structure and Parameter Errors

Improved return level estimation via a weighted likelihood, latent spatial extremes model

Using Kriging with a heterogeneous measurement error to improve the accuracy of extreme precipitation return level estimation

Accuracy Assessments and Uncertainty Analysis of Spatially Explicit Modeling for Land Use/cover Change and Urbanization: A Case in Beijing Metropolitan Area

Simplified Models for Uncertainty Quantification of Extreme Events Using Monte Carlo Technique

Comparing Nonlinear Regression and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Assessment of Prediction Uncertainty in Vadose Zone Modeling

Uncertainty Intercomparison of Different Hydrological Models in Simulating Extreme Flows

Modeling spatial extremes using normal mean-variance mixtures

Estimation and uncertainty quantification for extreme quantile regions

Flexible and Fast Spatial Return Level Estimation Via a Spatially Fused Penalty

Estimating Models of Extreme Behavior: A Monte Carlo Comparison Between SWAT and Quantise Regression

Estimating Threshold-Exceeding Probability Maps of Environmental Variables with Markov Chain Random Fields

Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science

A Fuzzy Quantification Approach of Uncertainties in an Extreme Wave Height Modeling

Uncertainty characterization in spatial categorical information

Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes

A streamlined approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with spatial outputs with an example from geodiversity assessment

Environmental Data: Multivariate Extreme Value Theory In Practice