004 Peroxidation due to cryoprotectant treatment is a vital factor for cell survival in Arabidopsis young seedling cryopreservation
li ren,di zhang,xiangning jiang,ying ga,weiming wang,barbara m reed,xiaohui shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.09.010
IF: 2.728
2013-01-01
Cryobiology
Abstract:Cryoprotectants are important for cell survival in cryopreservation, however, they can also cause some complex stresses, such as osmotic injury and dehydration stress (Uchendu et al., 2010). Revealing the mechanisms of abiotic stress originating from cryoprotectants will help us to improve plant cell survival after cryopreservation. Generally, some mono-tissue or organ, such as seed, pollen and shoot tips were usually used as materials in vitrification (Liu et al., 1999). Callus, suspension cell and seedling were difficult to cryopreserve due to the higher water content, vigorous metabolic activities, and complicated biological processes. Therefore, using suitable plant materials to uncover the dynamic process of metabolism, stress response and signaling transduction has important significance in cryobiological theory and plant cryopreservation practical operation. Arabidopsis is a good species to study plant cryopreservation at the molecular level. In this study, Arabidopsis young seedlings were cryopreserved, and the ability to recover from cryogenic treatment was lost as germination progressed. Germination could be restored in 48-h-old seedlings after cryopreservation, whereas 72-h-old seedlings died. Why seedling age and survival are negatively correlated is an interesting issue. To understand the mechanism of this correlation, a comparative transcriptomics was performed to screen differentially expressed genes between 48- and 72-h-old seedlings after exposure to the cryoprotectant in the vitrification protocol. A total of 7146 TDFs were detected, and 166 differentially expressed TDFs were analyzed. Among these, some oxidative stress-related genes were obviously up regulated in 48-h-old seedlings and down regulated in 72-h-old seedlings after osmoprotection and dehydration. It was indicated that the 48- and 72-h-old seedlings suffered oxidative stress, and 48-h-old seedlings effectively resisted oxidative stress. Membrane lipids are primary targets for oxidative stress, and MDA as a product of lipid peroxidation showed significant differences in 48- and 72-h-old seedlings during cryopreservation. The MDA increased nearly 2-fold in 72-h-old seedlings. There was a significant negative correlation between MDA content and survival ratio. These results indicated that both seedlings suffered lipid peroxidation, and the membrane lipid of 72-h-old seedlings was severely injured after osmoprotection and dehydration. Serious peroxidation injured membrane systems, resulted in photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation damage, and further decreased Calvin cycle activity in 72-h-old seedlings. Accompanied by oxidative stress, the apoptosis-like events were found in cryopreservation of Arabidopsis seedlings. 72-h-old seedlings showed negative FDA staining (an apoptosis marker) during the cryopreservation process. In contrast, 48-h-old seedlings exhibited bright fluorescence, and the defender against apoptotic death 1 involved in suppression of apoptosis was up regulated in 48-h-old seedlings after osmoprotection and dehydration, indicating that 48-h-old seedlings had inhibited apoptosis initiation. The strategies of oxidative stress response under osmoprotection and dehydration were different between the two age seedlings, viz, 48-h-old seedlings can effectively suppress apoptosis and resist oxidative stress to ensure cell survival, while 72-h-old seedlings suffered serious membrane lipid peroxidation leading to cell death. Overall, oxidative stress is the major stress in cryoprotectant treatment, and reducing the injury of peroxidation is the key factor to successful cryopreservation. This study provided an insight into genetic regulatory mechanisms in plant cryopreservation. Source of funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Funding of China (No. 31170655), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M510849). Conflict of interest: None declared. [email protected]