Integrating Smart Greenhouse Cover, Reduced Nitrogen Dose and Biostimulant Application as a Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Cherry Tomato

Roberta Paradiso,Ida Di Mola,Lucia Ottaiano,Eugenio Cozzolino,Maria Eleonora Pelosi,Massimo Rippa,Pasquale Mormile,Mauro Mori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13030440

2024-02-03

Plants

Abstract:Fruit yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes are strongly influenced by light conditions and nitrogen (N) availability, however, the interaction between these factors is still unclear. We evaluated the effects on cherry tomatoes of two tunnel plastic covers with different optical properties and three N doses, also in combination with a biostimulant treatment. We compared a diffuse light film (Film1) and a conventional clear film (Film2), and three N levels, corresponding to 50% (N50), 75% (N75) and 100% (N100) of the optimal dose, with and without a microbial plus a protein hydrolysed biostimulant, compared to a non-treated control. The three experimental treatments significantly interacted on several yield and quality parameters. In control plants (untreated with biostimulants), the early yield was higher at reduced N doses compared to N100, with greater increments under the diffusive Film1 compared to the clear Film2 (+57.7% and +37.0% vs. +31.7% and +16.0%, in N50 and N75 respectively). Film1 boosted the total fruit production at all the N rates and with or without biostimulants, compared to Film2, with stronger effects under sub-optimal N (+29.4% in N50, +21.2% in N75, and +7.8% in N100, in plants untreated with biostimulant). Total yield decreased with decreasing N levels, while it always increased with the application of biostimulants, which counterbalanced the detrimental effects of N shortage. Quality traits were mainly affected by the cover film and the biostimulant treatment. The diffusive film increased the content of carotenoids, lycopene and total phenols compared to the clear one, and the biostimulants increased texture, soluble solids, phenols and ascorbic acid compared to the untreated control. It is worth noting that in plants fertilized at 75% of the reference N dose, the biostimulants determined higher yield than the N100 untreated control, under both the covers (+48% in Film1 and +20% in Film2). In conclusion, the diffusive film improved the fruit yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes in the spring–summer period, presumably avoiding plant stress due to high-intensity direct light. Reduced N rates limited the plant productivity, however, the biostimulant application was effective in compensating for the detrimental effects of sub-optimal supply of N synthetic fertilizers.

plant sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily discusses the issue of implementing sustainable cultivation strategies for greenhouse-grown cherry tomatoes by integrating intelligent greenhouse covering materials, reducing nitrogen fertilizer application, and using biostimulants. The study evaluated the impact of two tunnel plastic covering materials with different optical properties (a diffusive light film Film1, and a conventional transparent film Film2) combined with three nitrogen fertilizer doses (50%, 75%, and 100% of the optimal dose, labeled as N50, N75, and N100, respectively) and the application of biostimulants on the yield and quality of cherry tomatoes.

In the absence of biostimulants, reduced nitrogen fertilizer doses (N50 and N75) led to higher early yields compared to the N100 dose, especially under the diffusive light of Film1, where the increase in yield was more significant. The diffusive light film Film1 improved the total fruit production regardless of the application of biostimulants, particularly under sub-optimal nitrogen supply conditions (N50 and N75), where the effect was stronger. The total yield decreased with lower nitrogen levels, but the application of biostimulants effectively offset the negative impact of nitrogen shortage, enhancing fruit yield.

Quality characteristics were mainly influenced by the type of covering film and biostimulant treatment. The diffusive film increased the content of carotenoids, lycopene, and total phenols, while biostimulants improved fruit texture, soluble solids, phenolics, and ascorbic acid content. Notably, under the reference nitrogen fertilizer dose of 75%, the fruit yield with biostimulant treatment was higher than the untreated N100 control group under both covering materials (an increase of 48% under Film1 and 20% under Film2). In conclusion, the diffusive film improved the yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes during the spring to summer period, possibly due to avoiding plant stress caused by high-intensity direct sunlight. Although reduced nitrogen fertilizer doses limited plant productivity, the application of biostimulants effectively compensated for the adverse effects of sub-optimal nitrogen supply.

Therefore, the paper aims to explore how to enhance the yield and quality of greenhouse cherry tomatoes while reducing environmental impact, by optimizing light conditions and nitrogen management, supplemented with biostimulants, thereby promoting sustainable agricultural development.