Abstract:Psychiatry has always been characterized by a range of different models of and approaches to mental disorder, which have sometimes brought progress in clinical practice, but have often also been accompanied by critique from within and without the field. Psychiatric nosology has been a particular focus of debate in recent decades; successive editions of the DSM and ICD have strongly influenced both psychiatric practice and research, but have also led to assertions that psychiatry is in crisis, and to advocacy for entirely new paradigms for diagnosis and assessment. When thinking about etiology, many researchers currently refer to a biopsychosocial model, but this approach has received significant critique, being considered by some observers overly eclectic and vague. Despite the development of a range of evidence‐based pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies, current evidence points to both a treatment gap and a research‐practice gap in mental health. In this paper, after considering current clinical practice, we discuss some proposed novel perspectives that have recently achieved particular prominence and may significantly impact psychiatric practice and research in the future: clinical neuroscience and personalized pharmacotherapy; novel statistical approaches to psychiatric nosology, assessment and research; deinstitutionalization and community mental health care; the scale‐up of evidence‐based psychotherapy; digital phenotyping and digital therapies; and global mental health and task‐sharing approaches. We consider the extent to which proposed transitions from current practices to novel approaches reflect hype or hope. Our review indicates that each of the novel perspectives contributes important insights that allow hope for the future, but also that each provides only a partial view, and that any promise of a paradigm shift for the field is not well grounded. We conclude that there have been crucial advances in psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in recent decades; that, despite this important progress, there is considerable need for further improvements in assessment and intervention; and that such improvements will likely not be achieved by any specific paradigm shifts in psychiatric practice and research, but rather by incremental progress and iterative integration.

A new science of mental disorders: Using personalised, transdiagnostic, dynamical systems to understand, model, diagnose and treat psychopathology

A Dynamical Systems View of Psychiatric Disorders—Practical Implications

Major Problems in Clinical Psychological Science and How to Address them. Introducing a Multimodal Dynamical Network Approach

A Dynamical Systems View of Psychiatric Disorders—Theory

Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology

Towards a consensus roadmap for a new diagnostic framework for mental disorders

Network analysis: An overview for mental health research

A framework for a brain-derived nosology of psychiatric disorders

Mental disorders, network models, and dynamical systems

How to construct neuroscience-informed psychiatric classification? Towards nomothetic networks psychiatry

Developing a transdiagnostic Ecological Momentary Assessment protocol for psychopathology

A Network Control Theory Approach to Longitudinal Symptom Dynamics in Major Depressive Disorder

Possible Futures for the Psychological Network Approach: Agenda for Clinical Scientists

Applying a Dynamical Systems Model and Network Theory to Major Depressive Disorder

Big data networks: Dynamic Time Warping as a statistical tool for network analysis using Ecological Momentary Assessment data

Rethinking the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Data-Driven Psychological Dimensions, Not Categories, as a Framework for Mental-Health Research, Treatment, and Training

A Complex Network Perspective on Clinical Science

Towards a new model and classification of mood disorders based on risk resilience, neuro-affective toxicity, staging, and phenome features using the nomothetic network psychiatry approach

Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration

Applying a Dynamical Systems Model and Network Theory 1 to Major Depressive Disorder 2

Affective Disorders as Complex Dynamic Diseases – a Perspective from Systems Biology