What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the preferences of ovarian cancer patients for follow - up care, especially using patient - reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a method for personalized follow - up care. Specifically, the study aims to understand the needs and desires of ovarian cancer patients during follow - up, as well as their views on PROMs, including their potential advantages and barriers. ### Research Background and Objectives Ovarian cancer is one of the ten most common cancers in women, with a 5 - year survival rate of 37.6%. After receiving initial treatment, patients usually enter a 5 - year routine follow - up period. Within these 5 years, about 70% of patients will experience disease recurrence. When the disease recurs, the treatment is usually palliative. Living in fear of recurrence has a great impact on the quality of life (QoL) of ovarian cancer patients and their families. The treatment process is often long and intense, and early and late - stage side effects lead to impaired quality of life. In addition, female patients with ovarian cancer often feel that they are not fully involved in follow - up care and have unmet needs. These needs and the impact of treatment on quality of life vary from person to person. Therefore, the demand for personalized follow - up care is increasing. ### Research Methods The study adopted a qualitative interview method and conducted semi - structured interviews with eligible ovarian cancer patients from May to June 2021. The interview contents were recorded verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. A total of 17 patients were interviewed in the study, among which 11 patients were familiar with PROMs. ### Main Findings 1. **Need for Reassurance**: All patients indicated that, because ovarian cancer made them feel very insecure, their main goal was to seek reassurance during follow - up appointments. Patients obtained reassurance through doctors' verbal reassurance, blood tests (such as tumor markers), and imaging examinations. 2. **Desire for Personalized Care**: Patients' needs and desires change over time, and they hope that follow - up care can be adjusted according to individual specific needs. However, many patients said that they preferred to rely on doctors' advice to decide the follow - up frequency. 3. **Use of PROMs**: PROMs are regarded as a means of personalized care. Although most patients think that filling in PROMs is helpful for doctors to prepare for consultations and understand patients' conditions, many patients also encounter barriers, such as long questionnaires, irrelevant or difficult - to - understand questions, etc. Patients' acceptance of PROMs - based home monitoring systems varies, but they generally think that clear guidance and timely medical feedback are required. ### Conclusions Ovarian cancer patients hope that follow - up care can be personalized and seek reassurance. PROMs may be helpful in achieving these two needs. Future research needs to determine the most effective, patient - centered way to implement PROMs. ### Significance for Cancer Survivors By understanding patients' preferences for follow - up care, more personalized follow - up care plans can be established, thereby reducing patients' anxiety and dissatisfaction.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to personalise follow-up care of ovarian cancer: what do patients think? A qualitative interview study

Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective

Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a clinical quality registry (CQR) for ovarian cancer: considerations and challenges

Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient‐reported outcome measures

"Numbers call for action, personalized narratives provide support and recognition": a qualitative assessment of cancer patients' perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) feedback with narratives

Evaluating unmet needs in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: a patient reported outcome measures study

Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study

Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study

Patient and clinician-reported experiences of using electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) as part of routine cancer care

Improving the Understanding and Managing of the Quality of Life of Patients With Lung Cancer With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Scoping Review

The Development and Feasibility of a Novel Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Eproms) Questionnaire in patients with penile cancer

Improving completion rates of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer clinical trials: Scoping review investigating the implications for trial designs

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Capturing longer term surgical outcome measures as part of routine care of breast cancer patients

A Novel Qualitative Study Assessing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Among People Living with Psoriatic Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis

Proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer studies: a systematic review and call for action in future studies

Facilitators and Barriers in the Implementation and Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements in Daily Practice

Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Advanced Nursing Practice: What Are Key Considerations for Implementation and Optimized Use?

Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care

Relevance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Cancer: Detection of Underrated Psychological Distress of Palliative Care Patients in an Outpatient Setting