Abstract:Purpose – This paper aims at investigating the multifaceted nature of innovation networks by focusing on two research questions: Do cluster actors exchange only one type of innovation-related knowledge? Do cluster actors play different roles in innovation-related knowledge exchange? Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on data collected at the firm level in an Italian aerospace cluster, that is a technology-intensive industry where innovation is at the base of local competitiveness. A questionnaire was used to collect both attribute data and relational data concerning collaboration and the flows of knowledge in innovation networks. The authors distinguished among three types of knowledge (technological, managerial and market knowledge) and five types of brokerage roles (coordinator, gatekeeper, liaison, representative and consultant). Data analysis relied on social network analysis techniques and software. Findings – Concerning the first research question, the findings show that different types of knowledge flow in different ways in innovation networks. The different types of knowledge are unevenly exchanged. The exchange of technological knowledge is open to everyone in the cluster. The exchange of market and managerial knowledge is selective. Concerning the second research question, the authors suggest that different types of cluster actors (large firms, small- and medium-sized enterprises, research centers and universities and institutions for collaboration) do play different roles in innovation networks, especially with reference to the three types of knowledge considered in this study. Research limitations/implications – The present paper has some limitations. First of all, the analysis focuses on just one cluster (one industry in one specific location), cross- and comparative analyses with other clusters may illuminate the findings better, eliminating industry and geographical biases. Second, the paper focuses only on innovation-related knowledge exchanges within the cluster and not across it. Practical implications – The results have practical implications both for policy makers and for managers. First, this research stresses how innovation often originates from a combination of different knowledge types acquired through the collaboration with heterogeneous cluster actors. Further, the analysis of brokerage roles in innovation-driven collaborations may help policy makers in designing programs for knowledge-transfer partnerships among the various actors of a cluster. Social implications – The paper suggests a clear need of developing professional figures capable of operating at the interface of different knowledge domains. Originality/value – The data illuminate several aspects of how innovation takes place in a cluster opening up intriguing aspects that have been overlooked by extant literature. The authors believe that this may trigger several lines of further research on the topic.

The role of NPOs and international actors in the national innovation system: A network-based approach

Innovation Systems As Patent Networks: the Netherlands, India and Nanotech

Collaborative knowledge networks emergence for innovation: Factors of success analysis and comparison

Knowledge Networks for New Technology-Based Firms: an International Comparison of Local Entrepreneurship Promotion

National Systems of Innovation , the Triple Helix : Can the KnowledgeBase of an Economy be Measured ?

Innovation Ecosystems: A Cross-Industry Examination of Knowledge Flows and Collaboration Dynamics

Managing open innovation from a knowledge flow perspective: the roles of embeddedness and network inertia in collaboration networks

In-depth Analysis of International Collaboration and Inter-Institutional Collaboration in Nuclear Science and Technology During 2006–2015

Collaborative network of SMEs innovation projects: influence of scientific and technological institutions

The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey

Network dynamics in university-industry collaboration: a collaboration-knowledge dual-layer network perspective

Clusters and communities: raising the bar towards open innovation 2.0 paradigms

THE INFLUENCE OF FIRM KNOWLEDGE CHARACTERISTICS ON TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: A MULTILEVEL NETWORK STRUCTURE PERSPECTIVE

Triple Helix Model of University–Industry–Government Cooperation in the Context of Uncertainties

Influence of cognitive, geographical, and collaborative proximity on knowledge production of Canadian nanotechnology

Knowledge exchange and innovation in clusters: a dynamic social network analysis

Dynamics of technology emergence in innovation networks

Knowledge exchanges in innovation networks: evidences from an Italian aerospace cluster

Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006

Research on the Patent Innovation Performance of University–Industry Collaboration Based on Complex Network Analysis

Understanding the emergence and deployment of "nano" S&T