Assessing workforce trends and needs for oncology financial advocacy programs.

Rifeta Kajdic Hodzic,Christina Mangir,Jordan Karwedsky,Angie Santiago,Sarah Hudson-Disalle,Lori Schneider,Aimee Hoch,Wendi Waugh,Ashley Lile,Molly Kisiel,Elana Plotkin,Emily Hope Carroll
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2024.20.10_suppl.25
2024-10-01
JCO Oncology Practice
Abstract:25 Background: Financial advocates (also known as navigators/counselors) are an increasingly important role on the multidisciplinary team to improve equitable access to care by assessing and addressing risks of financial distress for people with cancer and their families. The Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) recently published consensus-driven guidelines for delivering financial advocacy (FA) services, but the field still lacks standard definition of roles, responsibilities, metrics, and benchmarks. ACCC’s Financial Advocacy Network Census survey provides an opportunity to monitor FA workforce trends over time. Methods: ACCC worked with an expert multidisciplinary committee to guide development of a Census survey. It was distributed electronically via Qualtrics to a subset of ACCC members (clinical and non-clinical staff involved in delivering FA services) in May-June 2023. Exploratory analysis was performed on 2023 Census data and results were compared to 2019-2020 Census data. Results: 95 respondents representing 70 unique cancer centers participated in the 2023 Census, compared respondents from 153 unique in 2019-20. Sample size varied between the two time points due to length of recruitment time. Most respondents were financial advocates (36% in 2023 vs 53% in 2019-20), followed by administrators (34% 3%), and nurses/nurse navigators (14% vs 21reported that their cancer center did not have any dedicated financial advocates (4% vs 10%). There was a decrease in the percentage of respondents reporting that their current level of FA staffing was sufficient to meet patient demand (13% vs 30%). A smaller proportion of respondents indicated that their cancer center did not track any FA metrics (17% vs 23%). More respondents reported receiving formal FA training (77% vs 30%). Conclusions: Despite variability in sample size across the Census time points, the trends are clear. There is growth in FA staffing since 2019, but patient demand for FA services appears to have outpaced workforce growth. There appears to be increased tracking of the impact of FA services, which can be used to support the business case for additional staff. Cancer centers can use ACCC’s FA Services Guidelines and corresponding assessment tool to measure how their current level of service delivery aligns with expert guidelines and specific standards for program metrics and training. Engagement in formal FA training has increased substantially, but an opportunity remains to reach more staff that support FA services to provide training (eg ACCC’s Financial Advocacy Network Boot Camp).
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?