Impact of uterine cavity filling pressure levels on pain and procedure duration in diagnostic hysteroscopy: A retrospective cohort study

Can Tercan,Emrah Dagdeviren,Ali Selcuk Yeniocak,Sultan Can,Burak Yucel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.16146
2024-11-09
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Abstract:Aim This study investigates the impact of intracavitary pressure levels on pain, visualization quality, and procedure duration in office hysteroscopy, comparing standard pressures (60–100 mmHg) with high pressures (110–150 mmHg). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving non‐menopausal women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy at a tertiary clinic. Patients were categorized into two groups based on intracavitary pressure: the standard pressure group (60–100 mmHg; n = 72) and the high‐pressure group (110–150 mmHg; n = 37). Outcomes measured included pain scores, procedure duration, and fluid volume used. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors for severe pain. Results The high‐pressure group demonstrated significantly shorter procedure durations compared to the standard pressure group (96.56 ± 34.36 vs. 163.00 ± 61.78 s, p
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?