Radiofrequency vs Steroid Injections for Spinal Facet and Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bo Xu,Xudong Zhao,Lei Zhang,Shouhan Feng,Jinxia Li,Ye Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s469615
IF: 2.8319
2024-09-05
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Bo Xu, 1 Xudong Zhao, 2 Lei Zhang, 1 Shouhan Feng, 3 Jinxia Li, 1 Ye Xu 4 1 Acupuncture and Rehabilitation Department, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; 2 Physical Therapy Center, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; 3 Oncology Department, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; 4 Rehabilitation Department, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Ye Xu, Rehabilitation Department, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, No. 2088 Tiaoxi East Road, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: Pain management for spinal facet joint (SFJ) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is challenging, often requiring interventions like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or corticosteroid injections (CI). This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of CI and RFA in treating SFJ and SIJ pain. We combine these treatments due to their shared pathophysiology, similar therapeutic interventions, and the necessity for an integrated approach to spinal pain management. Patients and methods: Literature search from PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and Google Scholar for published studies upto 31 st December 2023, and reporting data of patients who were treated using CI of RFA for SFJ and SIJ pain. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated. Results: Our meta-analysis incorporated thirteen studies. Overall, patients, treated with CI had a higher pain intensity score compared to patients treated with RFA (SMD=0.92; 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.65) at 3 months, and at 6 months (SMD=1.53; 95% CI: 0.66 to 2.40) after the treatment. No significant association was reported at 12 months (SMD=1.47; 95% CI: − 0.03 to 2.97). Subgroup analysis based on joint types revealed increased pain intensity scores in patients who were treated with CI for SIJ (SMD=1.25; 95% CI: 0.39 to 2.11) and SFJ (SMD=1.33; 95% CI: 0.09 to 2.57) pain. A negative but not significant effect was detected in patients, treated with CI for cervical joint pain (SMD=− 0.40; 95% CI: − 0.90 to 0.10). Patients treated with CI exhibited higher functional disability score compared to patients treated with RFA at 3 months (SMD=1.28; 95% CI: 0.20 to 2.35) post-treatment. Conclusion: This study suggests that RFA may offer superior pain relief with longer duration compared to steroid injections for spinal facet and sacroiliac joint pain. Decision regarding specific interventions should be individualized and consider patient preferences, clinical context, and potential risks. Keywords: radiofrequency ablation, steroid injections, spinal facet pain, sacroiliac joint pain, systematic review, meta-analysis, pain management Pain management for spinal facet joint (SFJ) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is challenging, and interventions, aimed to alleviate discomfort and improve patients' quality of life are crucial. 1,2 Over 25% of individuals with chronic lower back pain are reported to have SFJ, or more specifically, lumbar facet joint pain that is predominantly linked to degenerative osteoarthritis. 3,4 SIJ pain accounts for up to 20% of low back pain cases, and poses its own set of challenges. 5 Valid clinical and diagnostic tests for SIJ pain remain elusive, leading to diverse diagnostic approaches. 6 Both SFJ and SIJ pain result from similar underlying mechanisms, including joint degeneration, inflammation, and nerve irritation, suggesting that therapies targeting one condition may also be effective for the other. An integrated approach is essential for effectively managing spinal pain, given the interconnected nature of spinal structures and the common occurrence of multi-faceted pain syndromes. Although the SIJ and facet joints differ in size and function—the SIJ being larger and primarily responsible for load transfer between the spine and lower limbs, while facet joints facilitate spinal movement and stability—there may be overlapping pain mechanisms and treatment responses. Investigating these conditions concurrently allows for the evaluation of shared diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches, potentially leading to more efficient and effective management strategies. Additionally, comparing these distinct but related pain sources can highlight similarities an -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology