Liver Resection Criteria for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Multiple Tumors Based on Total Tumor Volume

Hao-Wen Shih,Yin Lai,Hao‐Chien Hung,Jin‐Chiao Lee,Yu-Chao Wang,Tsung‐Han Wu,Chen‐Fang Lee,Ting‐Jung Wu,Hong‐Shiue Chou,Kun‐Ming Chan,Wei‐Chen Lee,Chih‐Hsien Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08500-y
2024-06-03
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Abstract:In many Asian hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) guidelines, resection is an option for multiple HCCs. It is difficult to compare small but multiple tumors vs. fewer large tumors in terms of the traditional tumor burden definition. We aimed to evaluate the role of liver resection for multiple HCCs and determine factors associated with survival benefits.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problem of liver resection criteria for multiple tumors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Specifically, the study focuses on the following points: 1. **Evaluating the role of hepatectomy in patients with multiple HCC**: The study evaluated the impact of surgery on the survival time of these patients by reviewing the clinical data of 160 patients with multiple HCC who underwent hepatectomy. 2. **Identifying factors affecting survival time**: The risk factors for tumor recurrence were analyzed by the Cox proportional - hazards model, and the survival rate was analyzed by the Kaplan - Meier method. 3. **Proposing a new stratification model**: Based on the total tumor volume (TTV) and serum alpha - fetoprotein (AFP) levels, the study proposed a new stratification model, which divides patients into three groups: no - risk, single - risk, and double - risk, to predict tumor recurrence and survival time. ### Research background - **Limitations of traditional criteria**: Traditional definitions of tumor burden make it difficult to compare small but multiple tumors with a few large tumors. - **Safety and efficacy of hepatectomy**: With the progress of preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and postoperative care, the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy have been significantly improved, and many Asian HCC guidelines still consider it as a treatment option for patients with multiple HCC. ### Main findings - **Influence of TTV and AFP levels**: TTV > 275 cm³ and AFP > 20 ng/mL are associated with disease - free survival (DFS). - **Effectiveness of the stratification model**: - The DFS and overall survival (OS) of the no - risk group (TTV ≤ 275 cm³ and AFP ≤ 20 ng/mL) are comparable to those of patients who meet the Milan criteria. - The survival time of the single - risk group (TTV > 275 cm³ or AFP > 20 ng/mL) and the double - risk group (TTV > 275 cm³ and AFP > 20 ng/mL) is significantly worse. ### Conclusions - **Clinical significance of the new model**: For patients with TTV ≤ 275 cm³ and AFP ≤ 20 ng/mL, a good prognosis can be obtained even if they exceed the Milan criteria. - **Recommendations for treatment options**: The new stratification model can be used as an extended indication for hepatectomy, helping doctors more accurately select patients suitable for surgery. ### Future directions - **Multicenter studies**: More multicenter prospective studies are needed to verify the effectiveness and universality of this model. - **Comprehensive treatment strategies**: A comprehensive treatment strategy combined with other treatment methods (such as TACE, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors) may further improve the prognosis of patients.