Abstract:Aim To investigate the association, as well as to characterize the associated panel of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory markers, between the different components of the peri‐implant phenotype and the presence of peri‐implantitis/peri‐implant soft‐tissue dehiscence (PISTD). Materials and Methods A total of 324 implants in 112 patients were included. The following components of the peri‐implant phenotype were clinically measured through the use of a manual periodontal probe or a digital calliper: keratinized mucosa width (PIKM‐W), mucosal thickness (MT), attached mucosa (AM) and vestibulum depth (VD). The presence of peri‐implantitis and PISTD was assessed through clinical and radiographic examination. Mixed‐models logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse the association between peri‐implant phenotype and the presence of peri‐implantitis or PISTD, adjusting for relevant confounders. Multiplex immunoassays were employed to evaluate the peri‐implant crevicular fluid levels of a panel of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory markers. Results Peri‐implant health, peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis were diagnosed in 36.6%, 21.4% and 42% of the patients (classified according to their worst implant) and 35.2%, 34.3%, and 30.5% of the implants, respectively. In the multi‐level multiple regression model, the absence of PIKM‐W (odds ratio [OR] = 9.24; 95% CI: 2.73–31.28), the absence of attached mucosa (OR = 19.58; 95% CI: 6.12–62.56) and a reduced (<4 mm) vestibulum depth (OR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.05–6.48) were associated with peri‐implantitis. Similarly, the absence of PIKM‐W (OR = 6.32; 95% CI: 1.67–23.83), a thin (<2 mm) mucosa (OR = 157.75; 95% CI: 14.06–1769.9) and a reduced vestibulum depth (OR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.02–10.84) were associated with the presence of PISTD. Implants with PIKM‐W = 0 mm showed statistically significantly higher levels of interferon‐γ in both regular (≥2 maintenance/year) and irregular (<2 maintenance/year) compliers (p = 0.046 and p = 0.012). In irregular compliers, the absence of PIKM‐W was also associated with statistically significantly higher levels of interleukin (IL)‐1β and IL‐21 (p = 0.016, p = 0.046). These associations were independent of the effect of relevant confounders (e.g., plaque, compliance with maintenance, etc.). Conclusions Within their limits, the present findings indicate that (a) peri‐implant soft‐tissue phenotype appears to be associated with the presence of peri‐implantitis and PISTD, and (b) in the absence of PIKM‐W, the inflammatory response seems to be dysregulated and the soft‐tissue remodelling up‐regulated.

Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Can patients detect peri‑implant mucosal inflammation? Results from a multicentre randomized trial

Experimental peri-implant mucositis around titanium and zirconia implants in comparison to a natural tooth: part 1—host-derived immunological parameters

Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long‐term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants

Comparison of the effect of zirconia and titanium abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissues

The effect of brushing discomfort on peri-implant health in sites exhibiting inadequate keratinized mucosa width: A cross-sectional study

Clinical performance of zirconium implants compared to titanium implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes of zirconia and titanium implants in the posterior zone after 1 year of loading-A randomized controlled trial

Comparison of peri-implant submucosal microbiota in arches with zirconia or titanium implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of Peri-Implant Submucosal Microbiota in Arches with Zirconia or Titanium Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Periodontal conditions of teeth adjacent to dental implants with or without peri‐implantitis after non‐surgical therapy in patients treated for periodontitis: A retrospective study

Peri-implant conditions and their relationship with periodontal conditions in Chinese patients: a cross-sectional study.

Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium–Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

The association of clinical and microbiologic parameters with histologic observations in relatively healthy peri-implant conditions- a preliminary short-term in vivo study

Histomorphometrical And Clinical Study Of Connective Tissue Around Titanium Dental Implants With Porous Surfaces In A Canine Model

Soft‐Tissue Phenotype as a Risk Indicator of Peri‐Implantitis and Peri‐Implant Soft‐Tissue Dehiscence—A Cross‐Sectional Study

Patient-reported Outcome Measures Following Surgeries in Implant Dentistry and Associated Factors: a Cross-Sectional Study

Effect of different prosthetic abutments on peri-implant soft tissue. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies—A systematic review and meta‐analysis