Abstract:The development of process steps catalyzed by immobilized enzymes usually encompasses the screening of enzyme variants, as well as the optimization of immobilization protocols and process parameters. Direct immobilization of biocatalysts by physical entrapment into hydrogels can be applied to reduce the effort required for immobilization, as the enzyme-specific optimization of the immobilization procedure is omitted. Physical entrapment is applicable for purified enzymes as well as crude cell extracts. Therefore, it can be used to quickly assess and compare activities of immobilized enzymes. For the application in flow reactors, we developed 3D-printed hydrogel lattices for enzyme entrapment as well as matching housings, also manufactured by 3D-printing. Testing the resulting enzyme reactors for three different enzymes, namely alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus brevis, benzoylformate decarboxylase from Pseudomonas putida and β-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae, and four different enzymatic reactions showed the broad applicability of the approach but also its limitations. The activity of the immobilized biocatalysts was measured in batch experiments and compared to the kinetics of the respective free enzymes in solution. This comparison yields an effectiveness factor, which is a key figure to describe the extent the immobilized catalyst is effectively utilized. For the examined systems the effectiveness factor ranged between 6 and 14% and decreased with increasing absolute activity of the entrapped enzymes due to mass transfer limitations. To test the suitability of the hydrogel lattices for continuous operation, they were inserted into 3D-printed reactor housings and operated at constant flow. Stable product formation could be monitored over a period of 72 h for all four enzymatic systems, including two reactions with redox cofactor regeneration. Comparing calculated and experimental conversion in the continuous setup, higher values of the effectiveness factor in batch experiments also hint at good performance in continuous flow. This can be used to optimize complex biocatalytic reactions on a small scale.

3D Printing: An Emerging Technology for Biocatalyst Immobilization

Emerging 3D Printing Strategies for Enzyme Immobilization: Materials, Methods, and Applications

Recent Trends in Enzyme Immobilization—Concepts for Expanding the Biocatalysis Toolbox

3D Printing in Biocatalysis and Biosensing: From General Concepts to Practical Applications

Enzyme Bioink for the 3D Printing of Biocatalytic Materials

Biocatalytic Performance of β-Glucosidase Immobilized on 3D-Printed Single- and Multi-Channel Polylactic Acid Microreactors

Advances and Challenges in the Development of Immobilized Enzymes for Batch and Flow Biocatalyzed Processes

Emerging Solutions for in Vivo Biocatalyst Immobilization: Tailor-Made Catalysts for Industrial Biocatalysis

Advantages of Hydrogel-Based 3D-Printed Enzyme Reactors and Their Limitations for Biocatalysis

Enzyme Immobilization and Co-Immobilization: Main Framework, Advances and Some Applications

Optimizing Continuous Flow Biocatalysis with 3D‐Printing and Inline IR Monitoring

Polymer-Grafted 3D-Printed Material for Enzyme Immobilization—Designing a Smart Enzyme Carrier

Enzyme immobilization strategies for the design of robust and efficient biocatalysts

3D printed ceramics as solid supports for enzyme immobilization: an automated DoE approach for applications in continuous flow

Protein Mediated Enzyme Immobilization

Immobilized fungal enzymes: Innovations and potential applications in biodegradation and biosynthesis

Revolutionizing biocatalysis: A review on innovative design and applications of enzyme-immobilized microfluidic devices

Bioengineering toward direct production of immobilized enzymes: A paradigm shift in biocatalyst design

Is enzyme immobilization a mature discipline? Some critical considerations to capitalize on the benefits of immobilization