Guiltily indebted? How a word is linked to individual borrowing

Tamara BogatzkiDavid StadelmannBenno Torglera WZB Berlin Social Science Center,Berlin,Germanyb Kiel University,Kiel,Germanyc University of Bayreuth,Bayreuth,Germanyd Centre for Behavioural Economics,Society and Technology (BEST). Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane,Australiae School of Economics and Finance,Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane,Australiaf ARC Training Centre for Behavioural Insights for Technology Adoption (BITA),Brisbane,Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2302891
2024-01-16
Applied Economics Letters
Abstract:Using data from the World Values Survey, we show that individuals who speak a language in which the same word is used for both (financial) debt and (moral) guilt have a statistically significant and economically meaningful lower likelihood of borrowing money. This relationship holds even after controlling for a range of covariates, fixed effects, grammatical future tense reference, and the Germanic language family. Our results suggest that the synonymity of debt and guilt may be a hitherto overlooked aspect in explaining borrowing behaviour.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?