Undergraduate students' perception of cardiorespiratory physiology during exercise: teleological vs. mechanistic thinking

Marcela S. Araújo,André L. Teixeira,Amanda Esteves,Jeann Sabino-Carvalho,Lauro C. Vianna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05073-2
IF: 3.263
2024-01-30
BMC Medical Education
Abstract:Physiology is widely recognized as a difficult course, which can potentially increase students' withdrawal and failures rates. Several factors are likely contributing to the difficulties in learning physiology, including inherent features of the discipline as well as aspects related to instructions and/or students' perception. With regards to the later, it is currently unknown how students of exercise physiology think and explain physiology in terms of its cause or consequence (i.e., teleological or mechanistic thinking). Therefore, the aims of the present study were to determine 1) whether undergraduate students' perception of cardiorespiratory physiology during exercise follows a predominant teleological or mechanistic thinking, and 2) whether prior enrollment in physiology courses can influence the predominance of teleological vs. mechanistic thinking.
education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?