Emphasizing the Co-Benefits of Heat Island Mitigation: Lessons from U.S. Local Governments Engaged in Climate Protection

Niko Dietsch

Abstract:Urban areas are facing increased daily temperatures caused, in part, by the heat island effect. This is of concern to city officials and the public because heat islands result in additional demand for summertime air conditioning and a range of impacts to the environment and public health. However, research and on-the-ground experience indicate that by planting shade trees, installing “cool roof” products (i.e., high reflectivity and emissivity), using reflective paving materials, and planting green roofs, local governments can mitigate the heat island effect. Despite the existence of readily available mitigation strategies, local officials face barriers to policies and projects intended to reduce or adapt to oppressive summertime temperatures. Fortunately, concerned stakeholders are demonstrating that these strategies help communities achieve their economic, environmental, and public health objectives. This gives extra weight to the argument that heat island mitigation is a sound investment. The experience of cities participating in the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives’ (ICLEI) Urban Heat Island Policy Adoption and Peer Exchange Initiative illustrates how focusing on “co-benefits” can help communities integrate heat island mitigation measures into their building and land use plans, increasing the quantity of successful projects. The Initiative also demonstrates how leading local governments can foster the adoption of heat island reduction strategies in other communities. This paper surveys recent heat island mitigation efforts in cities affiliated with ICLEI’s international climate protection program. Lessons learned from these jurisdictions are identified, with an emphasis on how co-benefits are motivating action.

Environmental Science,Political Science