Abstract:Background: Accurate sizing of stent grafts during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is critical for a successful outcome. Centerline measurements using three-dimensional reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the current standard for stent graft sizing. However, this technique is predicated on an idealized straightened aorta and does not account for the variability in the aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle or the overall status of the patient's volume. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers real-time cross-sectional imaging of the aorta orthogonal to the support wire, thereby providing an adjunctive method for aortic diameter determination at the time of TEVAR. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent TEVAR for nontraumatic aortic pathology from July 2015 to December 2015. Preoperative CTA images were reconstructed on a dedicated three-dimensional workstation. CTA centerline aortic diameter measurements were performed in major and minor axes at 1-cm intervals from the left subclavian origin to 20 cm distally. The IVUS images were acquired intraoperatively through 1-cm stepwise pullback along the aorta from the left subclavian origin to 20 cm. IVUS aortic diameters were measured at the maximum phase during the cardiac cycle. The average values of major and minor axes diameters from both modalities were calculated at each location for comparison. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between different imaging modalities. Results: During the study period, 26 patients underwent TEVAR. Of these, 20 patients had adequate CTA and IVUS images, providing 355 paired measurements. There was a high correlation between CTA- and IVUS-determined aortic diameters (R = 0.62; P < .001). However, Bland-Altman analysis showed that, compared with CT, IVUS resulted in larger aortic diameters, with the mean difference of 3.09 mm. There was a significant variability between IVUS and CTA with the standard deviation of difference (SD diff) of 4.56 mm. When stratified by the aortic position, a high degree of agreement was observed at the base of the left subclavian (position 0), with a mean difference of -2.69 mm and an SD diff of 4 mm. The agreement was the lowest at the angulated aortic segments (2 cm to 7 cm distal to the subclavian origin) with a mean difference up to 7.96 mm and an SD diff up to 8.27 mm. Conclusions: IVUS imaging and centerline CTA may provide significantly different aortic diameter measurements, particularly in angulated aortic segments. Caution must be taken when sizing a stent graft using CTA alone, particularly in an angulated proximal landing zone.

Laparoscopic trocars: marketed versus true dimensions – a descriptive study

Variables affecting surgeons' use of, and preferences for, instrumentation in veterinary laparoscopy

Laparoscopic Surgeons' Perspectives on Risk Factors for and Prophylaxis of Trocar Site Hernias: A Multispecialty National Survey

Geometry, penetration force, and cutting profile of different 23-gauge trocars systems for pars plana vitrectomy

Trocar‐site incisional hernia after 8‐mm robotic trocar placement: A prospective study

Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Not deep enough: Modeling the effect of shallow placement of the DaVinci Xi "bariatric" long trocar on the muscular abdominal wall

Effect of laparoscopic handle size on surgical performance: A randomized crossover trial

Comparative Study of the Use of Different Sizes of an Ergonomic Instrument Handle for Laparoscopic Surgery

A virtual simulation approach to assess the effect of trocar-site placement and scar characteristics on the abdominal wall biomechanics

A comparison of the relative risk of vessel injury with conical versus pyramidal laparoscopic trocars in a rabbit model

Does the angle of trocar insertion affect the fascial defect caused? A porcine model

Prospective study comparing the bladeless optical access trocar versus Hasson open trocar for the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures

Comparison of ultrasound assisted and intraoperative diameter measurement in acute appendicitis

A Cadaver Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of a New 3D Mini-Optical Navigation Tool for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter using optical coherence tomography: Inter‐rater variability

Development of an ultrasonically activated trocar system

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound- and centerline computed tomography-determined aortic diameters during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Factors Influencing the Difficulty and Need for External Help during Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Analysis of 485 Procedures from the Resident-1 Multicentre Trial

Surgeon-estimated costs of common consumables in otolaryngology

Comparison of surgical performance using articulated (ArtiSential®) and conventional instruments for colorectal laparoscopic surgery: A single‐centre, open, before‐and‐after, prospective study