Abstract:Marine ecosystems are important in mitigating rising atmospheric CO2 because of their capacity to store significant quantities of carbon (called blue carbon). To date, three key blue carbon ecosystems have been recognized (seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, tidal marshes), however, evidence is emerging that other ecosystems may also be important. Here, we use meta‐analysis of 253 research publications to investigating the role of other marine ecosystems in blue carbon. At present, mud/tidal flats, shallow sediments/fjords, some components of coral reef systems (e.g. lagoons), and coralline algal beds should also be considered important for blue carbon burial. Photoautotrophic marine ecosystems can lock up organic carbon in their biomass and the associated organic sediments they trap over millennia and are thus regarded as blue carbon ecosystems. Because of the ability of marine ecosystems to lock up organic carbon for millennia, blue carbon is receiving much attention within the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as a nature‐based solution (NBS) to climate change, but classically still focuses on seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, and tidal marshes. However, other coastal ecosystems could also be important for blue carbon storage, but remain largely neglected in both carbon cycling budgets and NBS strategic planning. Using a meta‐analysis of 253 research publications, we identify other coastal ecosystems—including mud flats, fjords, coralline algal (rhodolith) beds, and some components or coral reef systems—with a strong capacity to act as blue carbon sinks in certain situations. Features that promote blue carbon burial within these 'non‐classical' blue carbon ecosystems included: (1) balancing of carbon release by calcification via carbon uptake at the individual and ecosystem levels; (2) high rates of allochthonous organic carbon supply because of high particle trapping capacity; (3) high rates of carbon preservation and low remineralization rates; and (4) location in depositional environments. Some of these features are context‐dependent, meaning that these ecosystems were blue carbon sinks in some locations, but not others. Therefore, we provide a universal framework that can evaluate the likelihood of a given ecosystem to behave as a blue carbon sink for a given context. Overall, this paper seeks to encourage consideration of non‐classical blue carbon ecosystems within NBS strategies, allowing more complete blue carbon accounting.

All tidal wetlands are blue carbon ecosystems

Carbon pool and financing mechanism of coastal blue carbon ecosystems

Global blue carbon accumulation in tidal wetlands increases with climate change

Tropical blue carbon: solutions and perspectives for valuations of carbon sequestration

A Guide to International Climate Mitigation Policy and Finance Frameworks Relevant to the Protection and Restoration of Blue Carbon Ecosystems

It's time to broaden what we consider a 'blue carbon ecosystem'

Current status and emerging perspectives of coastal blue carbon ecosystems

The Role of Blue Carbon in Climate Change Mitigation and Carbon Stock Conservation

Total ecosystem carbon stocks at the marine‐terrestrial interface: Blue carbon of the Pacific Northwest Coast, United States

Blue carbon and the role of mangroves in carbon sequestration: Its mechanisms, estimation, human impacts and conservation strategies for economic incentives

Blue carbon as a natural climate solution

Blue Carbon as a Nature-Based Mitigation Solution in Temperate Zones

Blue carbon habitats in Aotearoa New Zealand—opportunities for conservation, restoration, and carbon sequestration

An Australian blue carbon method to estimate climate change mitigation benefits of coastal wetland restoration

Organic blue carbon sequestration in vegetated coastal wetlands: Processes and influencing factors

Mangroves provide blue carbon ecological value at a low freshwater cost

Estimating blue carbon sequestration under coastal management scenarios

Impacts of land management practices on blue carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes in coastal ecosystems—A meta‐analysis

Carbon Removal Using Coastal Blue Carbon Ecosystems Is Uncertain and Unreliable, With Questionable Climatic Cost-Effectiveness

Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

Assessment of Blue Carbon Storage by Baja California (Mexico) Tidal Wetlands and Evidence for Wetland Stability in the Face of Anthropogenic and Climatic Impacts