Comparative Analysis of Dehydrins from Woody Plant Species

Milan Karas,Dominika Vešelényiová,Eva Boszorádová,Peter Nemeček,Zuzana Gerši,Jana Moravčíková
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14030250
IF: 6.064
2024-02-21
Biomolecules
Abstract:We conducted analyses on 253 protein sequences (Pfam00257) derived from 25 woody plant species, including trees, shrubs, and vines. Our goal was to gain insights into their architectural types, biochemical characteristics, and potential involvement in mitigating abiotic stresses, such as drought, cold, or salinity. The investigated protein sequences (253) comprised 221 angiosperms (85 trees/shrubs and 36 vines) and 32 gymnosperms. Our sequence analyses revealed the presence of seven architectural types: Kn, KnS, SKn, YnKn, YnSKn, FSKn, and FnKn. The FSKn type predominated in tree and shrub dehydrins of both gymnosperms and angiosperms, while the YnSKn type was more prevalent in vine dehydrins. The YnSKn and YnKn types were absent in gymnosperms. Gymnosperm dehydrins exhibited a shift towards more negative GRAVY scores and Fold Indexes. Additionally, they demonstrated a higher Lys content and lower His content. By analyzing promoter sequences in the angiosperm species, including trees, shrubs, and vines, we found that these dehydrins are induced by the ABA-dependent and light-responsive pathways. The presence of stress- and hormone-related cis-elements suggests a protective effect against dehydration, cold, or salinity. These findings could serve as a foundation for future studies on woody dehydrins, especially in the context of biotechnological applications.
biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is to understand the structural types, biochemical characteristics, and potential roles in mitigating abiotic stresses (such as drought, cold, or salinity) of 253 dehydrin protein sequences from 25 woody plants (including trees, shrubs, and vines) through analysis. Specifically, the researchers aim to solve the problem through the following points: 1. **Structural Type Analysis**: Determine the structural types of dehydrins in different woody plants, including types such as Kn, KnS, SKn, YnKn, YnSKn, FSKn, and FnKn, and explore the distribution of these types in different plant groups (such as gymnosperms and angiosperms). 2. **Biochemical Characteristics Analysis**: Calculate the biochemical characteristics of dehydrins, such as molecular weight, isoelectric point, hydrophobicity (GRAVY score), and folding index, and compare the differences between different plant groups. 3. **Abiotic Stress Response Analysis**: Analyze the expression patterns of dehydrins under different abiotic stress conditions, particularly whether they are induced by stresses such as drought, cold, or salinity. 4. **Promoter Sequence Analysis**: Study the promoter regions of dehydrin genes to identify cis-acting elements related to plant growth and development, hormone response, and abiotic stress, in order to understand the regulatory mechanisms of these proteins. Through these analyses, the researchers hope to provide a foundation for future studies on dehydrins in woody plants, especially in the context of biotechnological applications, such as breeding crop varieties with strong stress resistance.