Reproductive Outcomes after Operative Laparoscopy of Patients with Tubal Infertility with or Without Hydrosalpinx.
Xiao Li,Liu Dong,Song Yong,Huang Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131942
IF: 6.133
2014-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:Infertility is defined as the inability for a couple to have children without any contraceptive methods within 1 year. Tubal factors are responsible for 25% to 35% of female reasons, and these have been proven to be a major cause of female infertility. Hydrosalpinx is a special type of tubal occlusion in which fluid accumulates inside the hymen of the tube. This adversely affects fallopian function, and hydrosalpinx fluids have a toxic effect on the quality of the embryos and endometrial receptivity. Currently, reconstructive surgery still plays a role in female infertility for tubal factors and has not been totally replaced by assisted reproductive technology in developing countries and districts.1 Direct visual examination of laparoscopy provides a detailed status of tubal patency and the relation of fimbria to the ovarian surface for ovum pickup, and also the presence of pelvic adhesions and endometriosis, which can be managed at the same time. Fimbrioplasty, tubal anastomosis, and neosalpingostomy are involved in tubal laparoscopic reconstructive surgery. We carried out some small trials to investigate the effect of surgery to reproductive outcomes,2 but the lack of large scale data involved the effect of hydrosalpinx on women' fecundity. Therefore, we retrospectively collected information of infertile women with tubal factors who were treated by laparoscopy, and compared and analyzed the reproductive outcomes of patients with and those without hydrosalpinx. A total of 668 infertile patients with fallopian disease diagnosed by laparoscopy were reviewed from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 in West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, China. The study was approved by the Medical Research Review Board of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients included in the study. The diagnosis of fallopian factors depended on the finding of hysterosalpingography or hydrotubation, and was further confirmed by laparoscopy. The inclusion criteria included regular menstrual cycles, aged ≤40 years, and no other reasons that caused infertility, such as male factors, ovulatory dysfunction, or uterine anomalies. Patients with uterine myoma, adenomyosis, endometriosis, tuberculosis, and endometrial disorders, such as endometrial polyps or hyperplasia, were excluded from the study. Following lysis of pelvic adhesions, procedures for tubal reconstruction were performed, which included fimbrioplasty, tubal anastomosis, and/or neosalpingostomy. Hydrotubation was performed by methylene blue dye at the end of surgery. During the procedure, the degree of fallopian disease according to the classification system proposed and modified by Rock et al,3 was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe disease. The presence of hydrosalpinx was documented and the patients were divided into two groups: hydrosalpinx group and non-hydrosalpinx group. All patients underwent laparoscopy with no complications and were discharged 1-2 days after surgery. They were then followed up by telephone or by visiting a doctor every 6 months to enquire about their pregnancies and pregnancy outcomes (ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth). The mean time of follow-up was ((25.41±3.36) months (20-31 months). A total of 92 cases were lost to follow-up among 668 infertile women (92/668, 13.77%). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) to assess for the presence of an association between the reproductive outcomes and Rock et al's classification degree. Chi-squared test and Student's t-test were performed using SPSS (version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. Patterns were tested for statistical significance with Student's t-tests of independent samples for continuous variables that passed the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, and with chi-square tests for categorical data, as appropriate. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Logistic regression was performed to assess the different prognostic factors affecting reproductive outcomes. The remaining 576 patients included 305 hydrosalpinx patients and 271 non-hydrosalpinx patients. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The patency of the fallopian tube after surgery was not significantly different between hydrosalpinx group and non-hydrosalpinx group (P>0.05). According to Rock et al's classification system, 13.11% (40/305) of patients were staged as mild, 50.49% (154/305) as moderate, and 36.39% (111/305) as severe in hydrosalpinx group, and 66.05% (179/271) were mild, 24.72% (67/271) were moderate, and 9.22% (25/271) were severe in non-hydrosalpinx group. During the 2 years of follow-up, there were 143 pregnancies and the pregnancy rate was 24.82% (143/576) for the entire study population. The pregnancy rate in hydrosalpinx group was significantly lower (18.03%, 55/305) than that in non-hydrosalpinx group (32.47%, 88/271, P<0.05). Among the 55 successful pregnancies of 305 patients with hydrosalpinx, the prevalence of ectopic pregnancy was significantly higher (27.27%, 15/55) than that in non-hydrosalpinx group (7.95%, 7/88, P<0.05). Although there was no difference in the spontaneous abortion rate between two groups (14.55%, 8/55 vs. 9.09%, 8/88, P=0.41), the live birth rate in hydrosalpinx group (58.18%, 32/55) was significantly lower than that in non-hydrosalpinx group (81.81%, 72/88, P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic variables among the preselected variables. Duration of infertility for longer than 5 years had a 1.84-fold higher risk of reducing the pregnancy rate after surgery, unilateral fallopian tube patency had a 2.02-fold higher risk, hydrosalpinx had a 2.08-fold higher risk, and secondary infertility had a 0.52-fold lower risk, as a protective factor for the pregnancy rate. According to the classification of tubal disease, the pregnancy rate was 36.07% (79/219), 20.81% (46/221), and 13.24% (18/136) in patients who were staged as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Among the conceived patients, six of 79 mild patients, 10 of 46 moderate, and six of 18 severe were diagnosed as ectopic pregnancies. The pregnancy rates were related to the extent of disease and pelvic formation. Patients with lower pregnancy rates had a higher degree of extent of disease in non-hydrosalpinx group (Z=25.442, P<0.05, by Cochran-Armitage trend test). The present study showed that laparoscopy was achievable and safe in patients with tubal infertility. Nearly 32% of tubal infertile women without hydrosalpinx conceived after laparoscopy. The pregnancy rate of patients with hydrosalpinx was much lower than that in non-hydrosalpinx women. Except the impairment of tubal transport function and oviduct mucous membrane, the main focus of the pathological mechanism in hydrosalpinx is the alteration of endometrial receptivity. Our previous results support the molecular mechanism hypothesis for the regulation of endometrial receptivity in infertile patients with hydrosalpinx.4 Moreover, a high recurrence rate of hydrosalpinx has been considered to decrease the pregnancy rate. In addition, our study also showed a significantly greater proportion of ectopic pregnancy in hydrosalpinx group. The possible mechanisms for the high prevalence of ectopic pregnancy in hydrosalpinx women include the impairment of tubal function, the drainage of hydrosalpinx fluid into the endometrial cavity, which has a toxic effect, displacement of the embryo, and a change in endometrial implantation proteins.5 Although there is no significant difference of miscarriage rate between hydrosalpinx and non-hydrosalpinx group, the live birth rate in hydrosalpinx women is lower as increased ectopic pregnancy. The pregnancy rate was found to be in direct relationship to the extent of tubal disease and pelvic adhesion formation in Rock et al's3 classification system. Using this system, we demonstrated that there was a significantly better reproductive outcome when patients had a smaller hydrosalpinx, better condition of the fimbria, normal tubal rugal pattern, and absence of adhesions. There appears to be a negative correlation between the extent of disease and the pregnancy rate. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic treatment for tubal infertile patients without hydrosalpinx. However, there is a lower pregnancy rate and a high risk of ectopic pregnancy in hydrosalpinx patients after laparoscopy. Further investigations are required for determining whether reconstructive surgery should be abandoned in severe hydrosalpinx. Acknowledgements: We thank Mr. Xiong Xiao for his help in statistical analyses.