Neratinib-Plus-Cetuximab in Quadruple-WT ( KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA ) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resistant to Cetuximab or Panitumumab: NSABP FC-7, A Phase Ib Study

Samuel A. Jacobs,James J. Lee,Thomas J. George,James L. Wade,Philip J. Stella,Ding Wang,Ashwin R. Sama,Fanny Piette,Katherine L. Pogue-Geile,Rim S. Kim,Patrick G. Gavin,Corey Lipchik,Huichen Feng,Ying Wang,Melanie Finnigan,Brian F. Kiesel,Jan H. Beumer,Norman Wolmark,Peter C. Lucas,Carmen J. Allegra,Ashok Srinivasan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1831
IF: 13.801
2020-11-17
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), HER2 (ERBB2) gene amplification is implicated in anti-EGFR therapy resistance. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and efficacy of neratinib, a pan-ERBB kinase inhibitor, combined with cetuximab, in patients with progressive disease (PD) on anti-EGFR treatment. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients with quadruple-wild-type, refractory mCRC enrolled in this 3+3 phase Ib study. Standard dosage cetuximab was administered with neratinib at 120 mg, 160 mg, 200 mg, and 240 mg/day orally in 28-day cycles. Samples were collected for molecular and pharmacokinetic studies. Results: Sixteen patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). 240 mg was determined to be the RP2D wherein a single DLT occurred (1/7 patients). Treatment-related DLTs were not seen at lower doses. Best response was stable disease (SD) in 7 of 16 (44%) patients. HER2 amplification (chromogenic in situ IHC) was detected in 2 of 21 (9.5%) treatment-naïve tumors and 4 of 16 (25%) biopsies upon trial enrollment (post-anti-EGFR treatment and progression). Compared with matched enrollment biopsies, 6 of 8 (75%) blood samples showed concordance for HER2 CNV in circulating cell-free DNA. Five SD patients had HER2 amplification in either treatment-naïve or enrollment biopsies. Examination of gene-expression, total protein, and protein phosphorylation levels showed relative upregulation of ≥2 members of the HER-family receptors or ligands upon enrollment versus matched treatment-naïve samples. Conclusions: The RP2D of neratinib in this combination was 240 mg/day, which was well tolerated with low incidence of G3 AEs. There were no objective responses; SD was seen at all neratinib doses. HER2 amplification, detectable in both tissue and blood, was more frequent post-anti-EGFR therapy.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?