Abstract:Climate change is increasingly being recognized as a serious threat to dominant modes of social organization, inspiring suggestions that capitalism itself needs to be transformed if we are to ‘decarbonize’ the global economy. Since the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, carbon markets have emerged as the main politico-economic tools in global efforts to address climate change. Newell and Paterson (2010) have recently claimed that the embrace of carbon markets by financial and political elites constitutes a possible first step towards the transformation of current modes of capitalist organization into a new form of greener, more sustainable ‘climate capitalism.’ In this paper, we argue that the institutionalization of carbon markets does not, in fact, represent a move towards the radical transformation of capitalism, but is better understood as the most recent expression of ongoing trends of ecological commodification and expropriation, driving familiar processes of uneven and crisis-prone development. In this paper, we review four critical Marxist concepts: metabolic rift (Foster, 1999), capitalism as world ecology (Moore, 2011a), uneven development and accumulation through dispossession (Harvey, 2003, 2006), and sub-imperialism (Marini, 1972, 1977), developing a framework for a Marxist analysis of carbon markets. Our analysis shows that carbon markets form part of a longer historical development of global capitalism and its relation to nature. Carbon markets, we argue, serve as creative new modes of accumulation, but are unlikely to transform capitalist dynamics in ways that might foster a more sustainable global economy. Our analysis also elucidates, in particular, the role that carbon markets play in exacerbating uneven development within the Global South, as elites in emerging economies leverage carbon market financing to pursue new strategies of sub-imperial expansion.

The Relationship Between Energy and Capital: Insights from The Wealth of Nations

Energy, Entropy, Constraints, and Creativity in Economic Growth and Crises

Innovation-Led Transitions in Energy Supply

Energy transition without dirty capital stranding

Toward Sustainability: Dynamics of Total Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Aggregate Income, Non-Renewable Energy, and Renewable Power

The Wealth of Nations: Complexity Science for an Interdisciplinary Approach in Economics

Economic history and the political economy of energy transitions: A research overview

The Export Of Capital To Colonies And The Falling Rate Of Profit In Economic Thought: 1776–1917

What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand

Piketty's second fundamental law of capitalism as an emergent property in a kinetic wealth-exchange model of economic growth

Comparative capitalisms in the Anthropocene: a research agenda for green transition

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

The Money-Energy-Technology Complex and Ecological Marxism: Rethinking the Concept of “Use-value” to Extend Our Understanding of Unequal Exchange, Part 1

Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets

On some economic principles of the energy transition

The asymmetric impact of renewable and non-renewable energy on total factor carbon productivity in 114 countries: Do urbanization and income inequality matter?

Adam Smith and Macroeconomics

Substitutes or complements? Relationship between natural resources and physical capital – a few stylised facts

Does Economic Growth Matter? Technology-Push, Demand-Pull and Endogenous Drivers of Innovation in the Renewable Energy Industry

An energy-based macroeconomic model validated by global historical series since 1820

Exploring non-linear causal nexus between economic growth and energy consumption across various R&D regimes: Cross-country evidence from a PSTR model